I just got a copy of the photographs from Lovers and Executioners that I lit this past fall in California. I am in the process of going through them and selecting the ones I want to post (There are a lot!). The shots were taken on the run-through before the first preview. We did a lot of work during that week of previews(six or seven shows all with extensive revisions) so the final lighting was quite different than that run.
Beyond that there are some interesting problems with the shoot. The photographer composed the shots to focus heavily on the foreground. While this was a major idea in the lighting it was not as extreme as it appears in the photographs. The scenery was not as dark relative to the actors at it looks in the shots. This issue is not quite as extensive as this one, but quite a bit more than I would like.
I have seen shots of my shows that look so different than the actual production that I have not posted them as I do not feel they are representative of my work. Sometimes this has been the case when the photographs make it look better! Its a matter of ethics. I would rather get work for what I did than what a photographer did. Still, those instances are representations of my work in the sense that the photographer captured the light I designed. But at some point artistic license shifts the ground of the artist upon whom the work lies.
Until I get these photographs processed, take a look at the preset once again. Isn’t it lovely?
Tags: documentation, ethics, lande, lovers and executioners, photographs, pictures, practical theory, shows
Yes, this set was beautiful and the lighting is amazing. For example, the blue light in the back and the layers and multilevels.
It’s gorgeous. And the play was a total joy!
Assissotom
Really great site with alot of good information!! Keep up the good work!!!!