Archive for September, 2009

Ten Thousand Shades of Gray

Monday, September 28th, 2009

Walking to the theater the other day between rain storms I looked up to see the sky filled with clouds and the morning sun fighting its way through. The effect of this stopped me in my tracks as I gazed upon this wonder of natural light. The sky, ten thousand shades of gray as varied as all the colors in a rainbow, caused me to reflect upon my feelings regarding light and color and texture.

When I first discovered lighting design it was color that drew me to the medium. The ability to make something shine brilliantly or nearly disappear based solely on the color of light applied to it fascinated me to no end. I went to NYU for graduate school in large part because there was a heavy focus on color and color theory. Robert Wierzel, whose work was a major motivating factor in my choice of school, uses heavy saturate colors in a lot of his work. I had also heard of Curt Osterman’s color lecture which alone is arguably worth the price of the degree. By the end of my three years I had certainly got what I paid for; a deep and rich understanding of the interactions of color.

In addition to studying with these masters of color I pursued study on my own through reading and exploring Joseph Albers’ The Interaction of Color and Kandinsky’s Concerning the Spiritual in Art. Beyond mere study, I conducted numerous experiments in the light lab late at night and in theaters whenever I was working on a show. The 100+ dances I lit in my time at NYU gave me ample opportunity to construct and test hypotheses regarding color interactions. Further, I would use new colors and new color combinations on my shows in an effort to expand my understanding of color. In short, the last eight years have largely been devoted to a deep study and analysis of color.

Seeing that sky with those glowing clouds made all those color explorations fade into the distance. A whole new orientation to light was opening up as the sun revealed itself slowly and carefully through the cloud cover. Shades of gray.

I have loved gray as a color for a long time. I would often refer to it as my favorite color but then fall back into more saturated color choices when it came to designing a show. That morning something shifted. The sky opened and in that moment something in me opened as well. The feeling was one of recognition. Recognition of something that had long been close by yet just out of reach. Recognition that the illusive something I had been chasing after for many years was now within my grasp.

Prior to studying lighting design, I had been doing black and white photography for several years. In photography light and color is all shades of gray. The focus is on shade and shadow and angle. Color, by virtue of the medium, is not part of the equation. It might seem obvious that such an interest in photography would lead to a design sensibility oriented towards gray. Instead there was a long journey through the world of color. This detour through color has been an invaluable experience in terms of approaching gray with the richness of its full potential.

No two grays are the same. Some are pushed a little to blue, others to green, and still others to red. The color distinctions I have from these years of experimentation give great insight into how each of these grays interact. Further, two nearly identical shades of gray serve radically different functions depending upon what angle they come from or whether they are soft indirect lights or hard directional lights.

Exploring light only through shades of gray forces the work to be more rigorous. This is true with any tightly controlled color palette. Because the variation in terms of color is so slight the focus comes down to changes in angle and brightness alone. When an identical cue is put up on stage in amber and red instead of blue and green it can cause a bit of a sensation. The effect, however, is largely superficial.

A space must be revisioned to be completely transformed. The shadows must change, the hidden must come into view, we must shift our focus. Angle and intensity changes shift our understanding. Color can do this used broadly over the entire spectrum of hues. Color also does this contained within the narrow spectrum of gray tones and does so more effectively because the work the color is doing is more subtle and thus leaves the audience to their experience of the work rather than conscious of the design.

The possibilities contained within this tighter palette are very exciting. Orienting my work towards shades of grey will allow me to bring a new rigor and depth to the stage. I look forward to seeing what this new aesthetic sense will bring.

From the Archives: the art of money

Friday, September 25th, 2009

Note: This was originally posted almost two years ago in December of 2007. It is interesting to me to see how much more sophisticated my writing on finances is now than it was then.

I hope you enjoy.

The other day imomus mentioned that when money people get together they talk about art and when art people get together they talk about money. The money of art is something that can be rather difficult to talk about. I think this is a primary reason professional artists generally have agents. Leave the money dealings to someone else so the artist can focus exclusively on the art.

But the business of art is very important. After all it is with money that food and shelter are procured. In the theatre the business of the art is at the fore. Unlike disciplines like painting or sculpture that one might do in seclusion and then, once completed, present to the market, theatre is done from the beginning in collaboration and those collaborators must agree on what fees are paid, to whom and when. They must agree as to who controls the rights to what and under which circumstances.

Working in the theatre it is necessary to be at once a “money person” as well as an “art person.” But often one is a “money person” without much actual money. Or at least with an income with as much fluctuation as the stock market. Since all my work is on a contract basis and my checks(portions of the total design fee) are paid on an irregular schedule it can be very difficult to organize this financial situation.

I am a big believer in saving and investing and find the typical American’s reliance on credit cards as a “cash reserve,” or worse yet supplemental income, to be reckless at best. At the same time, due to the often inconsistent nature of my work, I have at times been forced to use this less than ideal “cash reserve.” But how does one save and invest reasonably and responsibly with such a fluctuation in income?

What I have found to be of greatest use is to treat everything I make in terms of percentages. I do have fixed expenses, things like rent and utilities, so there is a minimum I must make each month. But after that, everything can easily be scaled to the amount of money I take in. I put away a certain percentage for taxes, and another percentage for savings. Then what is left over is free for all other expenses.

By dealing with my money on a check by check basis(as opposed to yearly or even monthly), I am able to save money during the leanest times. If I try to save ten percent of my income, when a thousand dollar check comes in I can take out one hundred dollars and this is not noticeable in the regular flow of things. Certainly not when compared with attempting to gather thousands of dollars at the end of the year to put in savings.

Breaking finances down to small easily manageable increments makes the whole thing a lot easier to understand. This is why I enjoy sites like Get Rich Slowly. It takes a reasoned approach to personal finance and breaks everything down into components that are easy to manage. So much so that almost insurmountable feats like paying off credit cards is broken down into five easy steps.

The business of art need not be something to fear. With a little planning and research even the most organizationally averse can practice the art of money.

Of Mice and Men – US Tour

Monday, September 21st, 2009

For the next few months the production of Of Mice and Men that I lit last spring will be touring across the US. Hopefully the lighting will look just like we teched it, but one of the troubles with tours is that every venue has its own little oddity in terms of hanging positions, equipment and so forth. It is interesting having my name on work that I will never see, but so it goes sometimes.

Take a look below and see if the show is coming near you. The schedule looks something like this:

September

24 – Niswonger Center in Greeneville, TN
25 – Lexington Opera House in Lexington, KY
26 – Lexington Opera House in Lexington, KY
27 – Lexington Opera House in Lexington, KY
28 – Lexington Opera House in Lexington, KY
29 – Three Rivers Community College Rolla, MO
30 – Leach Theatre/MO University Science & Technology

October

1 – The Rosebud Theatre in Effingham, IL
2 – Center for Rural Development in Somerset, KY
6 – Fox City Performing Arts Center Appleton, WI
7 – Young Auditorium/University of WI in Whitewater, WI
8 – Young Auditorium/University of WI in Whitewater, WI
9 – The Grand Theatre in Wausau, WI
10 – George Daily Auditorium in Oskaloosa, IA
15 – Popejoy Hall in Fort Worth, TX
17 – Waco Hippodrome in Waco, TX
18 – The Paramount Theatre in Austin, TX
19 – The Paramount Theatre in Austin, TX
20 – Magoffin Auditorium, University of Texas, El Paso TX
21 – Higley Performing Arts Center in Gilbert, AZ
22 – Plaza del Sol Hall – California State University-Northridge in Northridge, CA
23 – Plaza del Sol Hall – California State University-Northridge in Northridge, CA
24 – Gallo Arts Center’s Foster Family Theatres in Modesto, CA
25 – Christopher Cohan Center – Cal Poly Arts in San Louis Obispo, CA
26 – Christopher Cohan Center – Cal Poly Arts in San Louis Obispo, CA
28 – Wells Fargo Center for the Arts in Santa Rosa, CA
29 – Wells Fargo Center for the Arts in Santa Rosa, CA

November

1 – Rose Center for the Arts in Longview, WA
2 – Rose Center for the Arts in Longview, WA
3 – The Mother Lode Theatre in Butte, MT
4 – Cam-Plex Heritage Center in Gillette, WY
6 – Five Flags Theatre in Dubuque, IA
8 – Mathis City Auditorium in Valdosta, GA
10 – The Forum in Hazard, KY
11 – The Paramount Theatre in Charlottesville, VA
12 – The Paramount Theatre in Charlottesville, VA
13 – COMMA Auditorium in Morganton, NC
14 – Wilkins Theatre/Kean U. in Union, NJ
15 – Wilkins Theatre/Kean U. in Union, NJ
16 – George Hall Auditorium in Ogdensburg, NY
17 – George Hall Auditorium in Ogdensburg, NY
18 – University of Maine Orono, ME
19 – The Zeiterion Theatre in New Bedford, MA
20 – The Zeiterion Theatre in New Bedford, MA
21 – Eisenhower Hall Theatre at West Point
22 – Walt Whitman Hall Brooklyn University in Brooklyn, NY

Updating Style – The Balance of Revivals

Monday, September 14th, 2009

One of the great advantages that performance mediums have over the plastic arts is their immediacy. The work exists in real time and consists of a direct energetic exchange between performer and audience. The immediacy of the performance experience is typically mirrored by a design style that has direct aesthetic resonance with the contemporary world. When dealing with classics, like the Greeks or Shakespeare, the visual style is often updated in such a way that there are two parallel stories occurring for the audience. There is the story of the dialogue and the story of the visual world. Handling contemporary works and classics are often quite clear. There is a middle ground, however, that can be nebulous and murky; the revival.

Revivals, as I am discussing them, are shows anywhere from about ten to a hundred years old. They are old enough that they have already had a successful life as a contemporary work but new enough that they land within, albeit near the edges of, contemporary aesthetics. Revivals are very common in the three major disciplines of dramatic performance; theater, dance and opera.

Last week I posted Antony Tudor’s notes on the design for Lilac Garden, a revival of which I lit several years ago. With that piece we had the dual job of remaining faithful to the spirit of the original and at the same time making the work visually accessible to a contemporary audience.

Finding the balance between the aesthetic spirit of the original and the contemporary eye can be quite difficult when reviving a work. We are ultimately concerned with creating relevant and challenging work for our audience and as such make decisions that at times run counter to how the work was originally presented. Were our interest merely to recreate the work exactly as it was originally seen it would fail dramatically in terms of creating an experience fully embodying the immediacy of now.

When I worked at San Francisco Opera we would run into this problem regularly. Pieces that had been sitting on shelves and in warehouses, literally for decades, would be dusted off and presented on stage. Sometimes the sheer force of history would be compelling like the Tosca which was a recreation of the original design that had opened up the Opera house in the 1930’s or the Traviata designed by John Conklin before his deconstructionist phase.

Many times the works would not stand up on their own and would need to be reconsidered. Colors might get updated from the greenish blues of the 1980’s to the cleaner blues used today. Heavy ambers, once quite compelling, would be exchanged for crisper warm tones. Intensities would be brought up to more accurately match an eye that is now used to brighter stages.

In each of these cases a balance must be struck between the design as it originally was and the production as it reads today. Similarly, these issues come in to play with new productions of older plays all the time. The South Pacific I am currently assisting on is one such example. The designs by Michael Yeargan and Don Holder at once contain the spirit of the show as it was written and pay homage to an older aesthetic viewpoint. At the same time their designs land firmly within the contemporary visual language we speak today.

This balance with the visual language is a significant contributor to the success of the show on Broadway. Creating a design that is not just a contemporary look backwards but rather a fusion of styles gives the piece its power and allows it to neither fall into the trap of museum curiosity nor pure commentary. Some aspects of the show which, given what we know about the world today, sound foolishly naive become accessible. The design at once frames the piece and gives the audience a way in to a different world. It is true to itself and is true to that historical world on its own terms.

This world into which the work gives us access is not the “world of the play” so often discussed by theater makers. It is the world in which the play was written. The visual style orients the audience towards the work in such a way that it can see through the gloss of time and access it as the deeply critical and risque work that it was when it opened.

Variations on this theme exist in all works that were created in a different time. Being sensitive to not only the work and text itself but the orientation of the audience to that work is what makes a design successful. We create the visual framing devices that allow the audience to see the work for what it is and give them access to a text that may land far afield of their own native experience. Our work as designers opens wide the doors through which an audience may directly engage with the energy of the performance. Our work constructs the conduit through which that energetic exchange exists.

From the Archives: Freelance Finances

Friday, September 11th, 2009

Note:This post is originally from July of 2008. While my system has been modified somewhat since then, the basic structure and ideas are the same.

I left the piece unedited from the 2008 version, but upon a new read am aware how much my writing has improved over the past year.

Enjoy!

Of all the classes I took in gradschool not one of them focused on how how to organize your finances. We had a CPA come in one day and talk about taxes, but nothing on day to day cash flow management. It is surprising since that is rather central to freelancing. And given that this is what a large percentage of their students end up doing, it surprises me there was no discussion of it. I had to make this system up on my own, via some help from talking with friends and colleagues. My system will not work for everyone, it may only work for me, but perhaps some of the ideas will be useful to others about to begin the freelance design experience.

One of the trickiest things I have found freelancing is budgeting my money. The switch from regular to irregular income can be quite a shock to the system if not prepared. It has taken me a number of years to get the system I have working with most major kinks ironed out, but it seems to be doing well currently. Since some months I will be working constantly with a fairly high and regular cash flow and other months are like a river evaporating in the desert I have adopted a system that works no matter what volume my monetary intake is at. Most of it is based on percentages and that allows my budget to expand and contract as the intake does.

Obviously I have fixed expenses like rent, gas, electricity, phone, student loan payments and internet. Thus there is a minimum I must make each month to not go into debt. By and large making those minimums is simple. Everyone has these expenses. They are obvious. There are a few other less obvious expenses that stung me a few times through my not considering them necessary.

For the system to work, taxes, savings and a “dry month buffer” should all be considered necessary expenses. By looking at these as necessary expenses I make sure I have them covered rather than waiting until the end of the month or end of the year only to find out I spent all my income.

Since I do not get W2’s there is no income withholding which means I must do that on my own. I am also under no illusion that I will “strike it rich” as a theatrical designer, so I have an IRA that I feed regularly. Both the taxes and the IRA follow the same model. As soon as I deposit each check for a project I take a percentage(currently ten percent) of that and put it towards my IRA(and to a savings account for taxes). So if I get a hundred dollar check that’s $10 to my IRA. A $3,000 dollar check and its $300. Simple.

The “dry month buffer” is less precise. Rather than a strict percentage I simply try and maintain about 1-2 months worth of necessary expenses in my savings account. This has been the most recent addition to my system and probably the one most needing of refinement. My next major tweak to the system is to make this more precise and methodical.

By doing all this before I even look at balances for necessary spending I have been able to save a decent amount of money on what can, at times, be a very meager income. There are two things that make this successful. One is knowing that almost anyone can adjust -10% of their income. It’s just enough to notice, but not significant enough to truly impact daily life.

One further trick I picked up from a friend of mine who uses a similar system has to do with money for taxes. In March he takes all his savings for taxes and puts it in a 9 month CD. In June does the same in a 6 month CD. And again in September with a 3 month.

It looks like an online savings account actually provides a higher rate of return than a short term CD. So this afternoon I will be opening an online savings account to hold my tax money until the end of the year.

The final element to the percentage system is discretionary spending. I give myself a monthly allowance, alternately called a flexible budget or spending plan, for excess income every month. By again treating it as a percentage of income I am able to allow it to expend and contract based upon earnings. And since all my credit card spending is accounted for in that spending plan I am able to pay off credit card bills at the end of the month(or weekly when I am really on top of things) to prevent that from getting out of control.

This all may fall into the over sharing category for some. But to me I would have loved to have this information at my disposal when I started working regularly on 1099 income. I hope this might help you out.

Jardin aux Lilas Excerpt by Antony Tudor

Monday, September 7th, 2009

A few years ago I lit a production of Lilac Garden for New York Theater Ballet reconstructed by the late Sallie Wilson. I was given the following to help guide my lighting of the piece. It is written by Antony Tudor, choreographer for the ballet.

Wilson was rather exacting with her reconstructions and this was given to me as a means of most accurately addressing the lighting for this piece. In deference to the rigor with which we reconstructed the ballet, I am including Tudor’s words, unedited, with the inclusion of grammatical and spelling errors, as per the original.

I hope you enjoy.

“Jardin aux Lilas” is more often requested by companies for inclusion in their repertory than any of my other ballets, and is often asked for by groups with little experience and small resources in matters of technique, personal, or training. It must be supposed that, to a director, it must seem very practical in every way, but this is a misconception and a delusion. And the delusions seem to include that of regarding this piece as “romantic”, because there is a romanticism about the scenery with its overwhelming masses of lilacs, and of the predominantly blue lighting, for the dim light filtering through from the right off-stage area where we suppose the house to be is the only other color used.

Although the short story based on the idea of the “Droit du Seigneur” was abandoned, the situation remains a dramatic one, without the former melodrama, and the “dramatis personae” of the four principals are thrown into relief by the background of the young friends of Caroline with their easy sort of romanticism of the adolescents and teenagers.

The ballet is steeped in the conventions of the beginning of the twentieth century, when young girls of good families were trained in the good manners of young ladies of refinement, with the right social graces and an understanding that a girl remains a virgin until she is Married. Caroline’s young friend who makes his appearance unexpectedly, having unexpectedly, having played “french leave” from his Academy, has grown up with her as children together and they probably always assumed in their innocence that they would eventually be married with each other.

Unfortunately the diminishing fortunes of her parents, having no longer the wealth that was formerly theirs have arranged a betrothal, with her consent, to Caroline with a very rich young man of considerable financial means. He has great ambition, is very successful and is accustomed to knowing what he wants and always getting it, and his marriage to Caroline will open doors to many of the old families who still wielded enormous influence. The fourth of the group of principals is the fashionable about-town woman with whom he has conducted a love relationship of long standing, and she also appears unexpectedly upon the scene through the side entrance. It is understandable that characters of this complexity cannot expect to be performed by young talented technicians whose sole education seems to have been acquired in the limited conversations of the ballet studios and dressing rooms. And they can be very limiting.

In this ballet I had the inestimable advantage of working is out with dancers with whom I had worked very much before, and we were able to understand each other and to be truly “simpatico” but all of whom were bringing adult minds with them.

They understood my approach and worried with it, but Rambert herself did not and after a few incidences when she tried to get my dancers to put more motion into it, to “feel with the emotions” or in other words to ham it up and turned it toward the melodrama that I was so studiously avoiding, then it became necessary to forbid her to attend any further rehearsals of this piece, and if she as much as poked her nose in the door than all action came to an immediate halt.

This ballet concerns itself with the hiding of emotions from public display, but still conveying through the performance the emotions that were being concealed. As is the case with the majority of my ballets the performers must recognize the existence of the audience’s presence and the fourth side of the stage in “Jardin aux Lilas” is as much overgrown with lilacs in the old part of a manor house garden as are painted scenery on stage, and the proscenium arch is not there in essence. And the audience are witnessing the action clandestinely.

The ballet continues a regular course of narrative choreography until the moment of Caroline’s swooning into her betrothed’s arms. The succeeding sleepwalking episode, which should be handled as though water divination was happening, and the succeeding sequence for the four principals should be looked upon as if the ballet until this moment were being regarded nostalgically from a period still forty years ahead. This is ended by the White girl beckoning that the carriage has arrived to take Caroline and her future husband into their new life far away, and the ballet ends with her young friend left alone and solitary in the deserted garden, and regretting that he will likely never see Caroline again and that this last time together was made impossible of any joys of being together by the constant interruptions by other people in the ballet. Now all of this of the past and the future is now present.

Musically it is necessary that Chanson’s guiding remarks shall be followed and also that the main theme whenever it returns shall also return to the “l’istesso tempo”, especially with the entrance of the orchestra after the original exposition by the solo violin.

The lighting should be as though moonlight was filtering through overhead branches and should be of various shades from blue spotlights to cover the whole dancing area of the stage.

Boom Times – Open Comments

Friday, September 4th, 2009

One thing about freelancing that is virtually unpredictable is that you can be nearly unemployed for months at a time, perhaps just have a few projects on your plate. Then, like a summer rain storm in New York, the skies open and more work pours down on you than you can reasonably handle. You have barely enough time to finish all the projects on your plate and have to turn down projects you would have jumped at only a month or two ago.

I am now in such a phase and thus may not be up to my full blogging levels, although I hope to find time to get pieces written in my few spare moments.

I would like to invite my readers to share in comments their experiences with such situations. How do you handle a heavy workload or multiple projects? What sorts of project management systems do you have in place? How do you deal with income fluctuating by a factor of ten or more month to month?

Or just pop in and say hello and tell me what you are doing.

Thank you for reading.


Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.6.1, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.

Creative Commons License

All text and images on this site unless otherwise noted are licensed under a Creative Commons License.