Archive for 2011

Violence and the Art of Recouperation

Saturday, November 26th, 2011

The use of pepper spray has taken center stage in our cultural dialog. Be it police spraying peaceful protestors or shoppers “competing” (an amazing euphemism for unrestrained violent aggression) with other shoppers, pepper spray is there. “Casually pepper spraying cop” has become an internet meme which has honestly shocked me. An act showing such pure disregard for human welfare had, within days, become recuoperated into the narrative of consumption thereby mitigating the impact of this gruesome violation of human rights.

What is the connection between casually pepper spraying cop and the woman who assaulted a fellow human during a crazed shopping spree the day after Thanksgiving? Perhaps there is no connection and they just happened to use the same tool. Or perhaps they are both a manifestation of the same disregard for human welfare and show how fundamentally corrupt the moral structure of our culture has become. How else can Fox News commentators claim that such a weapon is “essentially a food product?” Of course when we enter the moral universe where pizza is a vegetable and corporations are humans all bets are off.

As an artist I have honestly been stunned by these events. Artistically stunned. The utter horror I have witnessed as violent disregard for human well being is seen as the legitimate response to people asking for a corrupted system to be fixed has made me at times physically ill. The violence here in the US is nowhere near the violence in Egypt, yet, the Egyptians are taking their cue from us in firing on civilians. These sequences of events shock me. The shock I am feeling is in large part making it impossible to create. As such it is forcing me to confront the role of the artist in times of upheaval.

Picasso’s Guernica is an amazing depiction of the horrors of war. What is the equivalent work for our time? In a world so heavily saturated by consumerist thinking is it possible to create a work that can stand in critique of that culture and its resulting violence without falling victim to recouperation itself? Perhaps Banksy and his ilk are the only ones. I have seen a number of new Banksy, or Banksy derived, works cropping up all over my Oakland neighborhood recently. For a cultural battle being waged in the streets, perhaps its truest artistic form must manifest in those very streets.

Or is it the rough edges of citizen journalism? In a world where moral and ethical obligations are not even considered in the dominant cultural narrative why should refined aesthetics have center stage? The rough unedited livestream documentary is the film. Not whatever reified and safely packaged docutainment Michael Moore shoves out of his studio in a year or two. The poets are on Twitter. The performance artists are hurling teargas canisters back at the lines of riot cops.

I listen to the narratives on twitter and the theater world appears functionally unaffected by the world around it. For a medium that lays claim to immediacy and the visceral experience, there is no larger conversation happening about how theater can engage this world. Sure there is the isolated individual. There is even a petition on line for #occupyBroadway doing free performances in Times Square. But how will that challenge the system? How will that stand against the dominant modes of power and control? How is that dangerous?

Merely doing a play about characters that embody the 99% misses the point. Willy Loman has nothing to do with the status quo problems. He is a product of mid-century American Capitalism. Sure it shares themes with now but we have moved past that. To do that play is to speak to the world before September 17th, 2011 when tents were set up in Liberty Park. We are on the verge of war. The powers that be have declared war in their violent repression of peaceful protestors. Now we see who will stand up.

Antigone is a play that speaks to now. The lone voice standing up for what is right against the entire force of the State apparatus. A friend of mine is currently working on a stage adaptation of Cory Doctorow’s Little Brother. But when we were talking about it, during the November 2nd General Strike, he mentioned that Little Brother was a post-9/11 story and that Occupy Wall Street has shifted the narrative into the next phase. Even a play that has not been finished yet is already outdated.

Theater is alive not because it is live. Peter Brooks wrote eloquently on the deadly nature of much that passes for theater. Theater is alive only when it connects directly with the world around it. When it plugs into the larger cultural stream and manifests, in physical form, our subconscious and our struggles. The Brecht and Weill debut of The Mahagonny Song Spiel caused riots in the streets. That is theater that is alive.

We do not need any more dead plays. Willy Loman is the champion for those who have not yet woken up to the radical inequalities this world faces. Willy Loman embodies the underbelly of an America we long ago sold to the highest bidder. Willy Loman died with the repeal of Glass-Steagal. Willy Loman died with Citizen’s United.

Antigone refuses to die. Antigone lives wherever the just are repressed. Antigone speaks truth to power wherever the marginalized have their voices taken from them. Antigone stands against the State whenever the State stands against its people. Antigone refuses recouperation into the dominant narrative. Antigone lives another day to chant “We don’t die/We Multiply/Hella hella Occupy.”

8-bit Luminosity

Wednesday, August 31st, 2011

About a year and a half ago I lit a dance piece that explored the relationship between humanity and technology. It had a large video component including live interactive video. In considering the light I wanted to create a world bridging the space between the human and the technological. The lighting rig was small and consisted of a mixture of incandescent lights and fluorescents. All the lights were in a color range of 4500-5600K. Daylight.

The use of fluorescents was obvious once I made it but my reasoning behind their use in that piece was a little different than “I want cold and mechanical.” If you look at the color spectrum of an incandescent light it is a gentle wave with peaks in the amber range and valleys in the cyan, but soft and gentle slopes define the nature of the light emitted from those sources. Fluorescent light is something else entirely. Like other discharge sources the wave form of the light spectrum is comprised of sharp 90 degree peaks and valleys as well as violent spikes in certain sections of the visible spectrum.

It was this digital quality that I was interested in. And while the fluorescent is an explicit example of digital light, behind the scenes it is all digital. With the exception of the most primitive lighting systems every light used in live performance is controlled by a computer. We see intensity values in the human friendly 0-100% range but this is just for ease of readout displays. The computer sends 0-255 hex values across a digital network to dimmers which convert those values into percentages of a 10v sine wave that gets chopped at various points depending upon the value received. map(0, 255, 0, 10); map(0, 10, 0, 100);

But light, especially incandescent light, is intensely analog. Anyone who has tried to do a zero count blackout and been frustrated when a zero count really takes about 0.5 seconds to reach complete darkness knows this. The problem is made worse dealing with larger lamps like a 5K where a blackout can take upwards of ten seconds.

Working in this digital medium for a while now I have seen points of interest come and go. I will find myself obsessed with color for months or years on end and then spend long periods of time only working with monochromatic palettes. I will explore texture or angle or the very quality of light itself in similar fad like ways. Yet two currents of aesthetic inquiry remain constant in my work. One is an interest in natural and organic forms and movements. The other, and deeply related to the first, is an inquiry into random chance and chaotic events.

Light provides ample opportunity to explore both of these ideas. Most digital lighting control is sufficiently sophisticated to get decent random effects tried out and there is as much or more technology available to explore ideas of organic forms.

At the same time there are distinct limitations. The scale of many of the ideas I want to try are cost prohibitive in the lighting realm, certainly on my own meager budget. While I can try out a handful of ideas on various shows, most shows I design do not lend themselves to the kinds of explorations that I am truly interested in. Thus it becomes a game of waiting for that one show to test that one idea.

Enter the world of computer graphics. It only takes a couple minutes to copy the code for John Conway’s Game of Life. From there, myriad parameters can be explored and manipulated for interesting results. Even the largest lighting rig does not contain the complexity to look at emergent forms and patterns in chaos at any scale of interest. Yet just a few lines of code can do all that and more.

The world we live in is technologic and interconnected. For art to truly capture the spirit of the world it must engage directly with that reality. Embracing and exploring our increasingly digital lives is both obvious and obscure. It is easy to put a cell phone on stage, or build a sculpture out of used computer parts, or paint with pixels. But doing that in such a way that furthers our understanding of our own humanity is the difficult task.

With the addition of a single color and a slight blur effect the Game of Life evolves from blinky computer simulation, to lifelike organic drama. It is turning a microscope on bits and capturing their millisecond of life. The line between the analog nature of life and the digital nature of computers is thin if not outright illusory. The shifting pixels on the screen become a life and death battle for supremacy. Survival of the fittest. Light and dark become life and death.

Having been in the business of creating fantasy worlds my entire adult life, I never would have thought that moving on to such a small stage would open up so many possibilities.

TimeLapse

Tuesday, August 23rd, 2011

I’ve been in the process of learning a couple of computer graphics programs and the programming language Procesing. I have long been interested in video and computer graphics and have been interested in Processing for over a year since I first heard about it. Not having a background in CS I was intimidated by the rather opaque nature of staring at lines of code.

Fortunately the creators of Processing are also equally interested in teaching. And since they created the language for the development of computer art they are interested in teaching artists. As such they have written one of the best textbooks I have come across called Processing: A Programming Handbook for Visual Designers and Artists. It takes a total novice through the iterative process of writing computer programs.

I am a little over halfway through the book. I made the following out of a series of modified programs from the book. The image was taken by my with a film camera and then scanned. It is then convolved through a randomly generated kernel to create the flicker effect. The colored squares come from the RGB data of randomly selected pixels in the image extracted and used to fill translucent squares in random locations across the screen.

I would not go so far as to call this art. But it sure is fun.

Here’s a 30 second movie of the program’s output:


TimeLapse from lucaskrech.


and a link to the original program if you want to see more than a static 30 second snippet.

The Last Five Years (or Happy Birthday Blog)

Monday, March 14th, 2011

Five years ago yesterday I wrote my first post in this space. It was actually a continuation of an earlier blog that was in the process of evolving from personal to work blog. What began on livejournal moved to my own domain with a WordPress install. A vast improvement.

In those 5 years I have posted 883 (this is 884) blog posts ranging from long essays on theory, to show opening announcements, link round-ups, pictures from shows, and more. I have no idea about total word count but I would guess there is a book (or two) in there if I sat down and edited.

It has been quite a wild ride.

During the last two years I formalized my blog quite a bit instituting a regular posting schedule of twice a week for about a year and then the more reasonable once a week I have been on recently.

Between my various personal and professional commitments, keeping up the weekly posting schedule, certainly without remuneration, has become too much. It has been an amazing exercise to maintain such disciplined writing. I have learned a lot about how to write on schedule and about the nature of my own creativity. I will continue to post here, but I do not plan on keeping specific time tables.

While this blog will be calming down that does not mean I am no longer writing. I hope to shift my lighting and design writing into commercial print media. I am in the process of putting together a few pieces for review. We’ll see how that develops. In the meantime follow me @lucaskrech on Twitter.

I learned immensely from this experiment. Thank you all so much for reading. It has been a lot of fun.

WestWave Dance Festival – Pictures

Monday, March 7th, 2011

Last November I lit a showing of the WestWave Dance Festival in San Francisco. The evening consisted of a selection of shorter works, averaging 15-20 minutes in length, by five different choreographers.

Festivals like this are a ton of fun to light. Not only do you get to work with a range of amazing people, but the styles of choreography are so different that they each demand a very different approach to color, intensity, movement, and atmosphere of the light.

Below are several images from the different works shown that evening.





Et choreographed by Andrew Skeels



Me No You choreographed by Robert Dekkers



Full Moon Syndrome choreographed by Erika Tsimbrovsky


Colombia Chasing choreographed by Brittany Brown Ceres



So You See… choreographed by Lisa Townsend

All images courtesy David DeSilva

Carmen Opens Tonight

Saturday, March 5th, 2011

West Edge Opera’s production of Carmen opens this evening at the El Cerrito Performing Arts Theater. Get your tickets here.

It’s the art stupid

Monday, February 28th, 2011

My work ranges a long vertical spectrum from the basements of art galleries to 1st National Broadway tours. It also has a wide aesthetic spectrum from the deeply esoteric dramatizations of post-Heideggerian texts to popular farce. I light for dance, opera, theater, live music, art installations, and more. No matter what medium I am working in, in whatever aesthetic vein, for however much money, the common thread is that we are all striving to make the best work possible.

It is an amazing thing to behold really. Because when it comes right down to it, if you are not in this for the love of the art you better get out fast. The hours are terrible, the money is worse, projects are inconveniently timed, and career advancement takes a long time as you slowly watch your mentors and idols die off. And did I mention the money was bad and the hours are worse?

There’s an old joke that runs something like this:
Q: How do you make a small fortune in the theater?
A: Start out with a large fortune.

Because of these realities of time and money and love of the product, we all make sacrifices. Some of us work shitty jobs to fund our underfunded art. Others take a de facto vow of poverty. Some are blessed with independent wealth which allows them maintain some degree of creature comfort. And should you be cursed with success every relationship outside of the work is negatively impacted.

The only other group I can think of who willingly suffers in this way is the National Masochist Association. So why do we do it?

I had a mentor of mine once say “If you can think of ANYthing else to do with your life that would make you happy, do that.” Being as I couldn’t, I didn’t. And why not?

Because the magic of creation is unlike anything else I have ever done in my life. Creating a work of art, a true work of art, one that engenders more questions in me than answers, one that leaves an audience breathless, wondering, joyful, and full of tears, is an experience unlike any other. Taking a dark room, a black box, and filling it with another world that moves and changes and transforms, is the most wonderful thing I can think to do.

The only other activity I have engaged in that gave me a similar sense of satisfaction was back when I did black and white photography. Shooting the film was fun. Waiting for it to develop was nice. But watching an image, my image, appear as if by magic, through the rippling tray of chemicals, on a formerly blank white piece of paper was amazing. Tweaking the various filters and exposure times to get the image just the right balance of light and dark was awesome.

So it is with light. Watching the curtain open to reveal a new world is an astonishing thing to be a part of.


Et by Andrew Skeels

Art is not easy and it does not come cheaply. It is no wonder then that throughout human history artists have been supported by nation states, corporations, or wealthy individuals. These people, like the artist herself, do it because of their love for the work. It does not make fiscal sense to pay for a piece of canvass encrusted with pigment infused oils, or to build a theater and attempt to recreate Greek Drama through the use of sung, rather than spoken, words.

No. These people, be they the Vatican, the de Medicis, or the Guggenheims play such a significant role in the creation of art because they love it. Perhaps they love it for reasons other than the creators. Perhaps that love runs less than altruistic. But love it they do. There are far more expedient means to social and political influence than artistic patronage. Without a love of the work there is no reasonable excuse for such otherwise absurd behavior.

Even contemporary examples are, I am confident, borne out of love for the art. While the current Spider-Man musical engenders no end of schadenfreude I firmly believe its creators are there for the sole purpose of making the best work they know how to do. I know some of them personally and can not imagine them doing anything else.

It is easy to sit at some distance from a trainwreck and point fingers and claim those involved are not “true” artists. It is hard to truly accept the fact that these people have the highest artistic standards for themselves and are pushing themselves as far as they can go. I’ve been involved in some trainwrecks myself. They are very unpleasant.

Art is not easy. Art is a delicate balance. A very delicate balance. When one item is off, by even a very slight amount, it affects every other aspect of the work. Sometimes balance is regained. Sometimes not. But if you never find yourself off balance during the creation of a work of art I have a hunch you are not trying hard enough.

Professional(ism)

Monday, February 21st, 2011

This past summer I was visiting my sister and her family. My niece and nephew were in a community theater production of The Wizard of Oz. I got to see the final performance of their run. There was much excitement from the kids as they were each payed $150 for the run of the show and could not wait to variously save it for a future big purchase or buy some toys right away. My brother-in-law turned to me at one point in this monetary feeding frenzy and asked, with a wry smile, “Does this make them professional actors?”

“Absolutely,” I replied.

But what does that word professional mean? Certainly getting paid for work is one commonly used definition of professional. But I have a hunch most people would see a slight difference between my niece and Idina Menzel. What does it mean to be a professional?

I know a lot of so called professionals, with memberships to their respective unions, working in the theater and making most of their money from other sources. Some are fortunate enough to teach, or assist more advanced professionals, but others wait tables, drive cabs, build websites, or assemble electronics. Clearly then making money can not be the only limiting factor when determining whether one is a professional.

Perhaps then we should look to something more ephemeral. Dedication could be one way of looking at a professional. Many professionals have dedicated all their time and energy to perfecting their craft and pursuing a career.

This line of reasoning only goes so far. We are left with the issue of those untalented yet dedicated folks who never get work but persist nonetheless and have more tenacity than many working professionals. At the same time, dedication becomes complicated by those who have the right connections to regularly get work despite a lack of interest or talent.

So dedication then, and even talent, are not enough to make one a professional.

Perhaps this question is being asked in the wrong fashion. Perhaps the issue is not about defining whether one is a professional or not. Perhaps a more interesting question is “What is professionalism?”

Perhaps being a professional is one of attitude and approach. Are you one time? Do you complete your work to the best of your ability and resources? Are you polite and courteous? Do you work towards the common goal of creating strong work? Do you make agreements and stick with them? Do you follow accepted industry practices? Do you set standards for your work and seek to exceed them? Are you constantly striving to improve your craft?

In the end, being a professional is something one self identifies as. It is not an absolute. It is a way of being. A state of mind.

Many people in the theater, especially outside major theater towns like New York, are talented amateurs. They might have one or two companies they work with regularly and they may do good work, but they are not professionals. This does not mean they are better or worse than anyone else. It simply means the center of gravity for their life is somewhere else. The work is community theater. I do not mean this in a pejorative or diminutive sense. I mean it is theater for the community of which these actors, directors, and designers are a part. That is a very valuable thing, but I am not certain it is professional.

Companies which refuse standard contract clauses like right of first refusal for a designer on a world premier are not playing hardball. They are demonstrating a lack of professionalism. A designer who imposes their “ideas” on a reluctant director and creative team who do not understand the design is not clever or innovative, they are displaying a lack of professionalism.

A professional, in a collaborative art form, must play well with others, deliver their work on time and be complete. They must be creative, if not innovative, and never stop trying to improve. Perhaps defining a professional is like defining pornography. I can’t give you a list of adjectives, but I know it when I see it.

at the end of the tunnel

Monday, February 14th, 2011

During the Passover Seder participants relate the liberation of Jews from Egypt to their own lives. The word for Egypt is Mitzrayyim. While used to refer to the Egypt of Jewish enslavement, Mitzrayyim translates into English as “a narrow or tight place.” During the Seder you examine your life and your own Mitzrayyim and how you have been liberated.

Over the past few weeks we have repeatedly heard the phrase “witness to history” with regards to events in present day Egypt. Since January 25th the common people gathered in Tahrir Square, itself a literal narrow place, in protest of their totalitarian government. This weekend they were delivered from that modern day Pharaoh. How appropriate then that Tahrir translated into English means “Liberation.”

The value of spirituality lies in the ability of metaphor to shed a light on aspects of our lives which are lacking or perhaps, more importantly, on aspects of our life where we lack gratitude. Far and away the situation of most Jews on the planet today is so far removed from the situation dealt with in Exodus as to bear a kinship in name alone. Yet even sixty years ago things did not look so good.

Times change.

The darkness of a tunnel can be foreboding when looking to the side at the imprisoning walls or backwards at the evidence of a long journey. Yet like that narrow place in Egypt it is only temporary. Up ahead shines a light. Outside the tunnel it is a clear and beautiful day.

In 2008 I watched as project after project I had been asked to light lost its funding and either cancelled entirely or reduced from an Off-Broadway to a Showcase contract. Projects fell apart and companies cut seasons. It was not a fun period. By the end of the year I felt brutalized by the economics of theater. Not one year before I was riding high on a fully booked schedule that had me darting back and forth across the country and across the Atlantic. I had no idea what was to come next.

At the end of 2008 I made a rather rash decision. The pretext I used was one of optimism, but the real cause was far from that. My career, it appeared from where I stood, had fallen apart. Time to put down the cards, round up the remaining chips, and go home. There was an air of defeat that I felt which was honestly a quite novel experience for me. Or at least it had been so long it felt new.

Needless to say, the proximate cause of my return to California dissolved in a blaze of glory in rather short order. Add to that a continuing downward trend in the economics of art and things looked bleak. Companies were scaling back on travel expenses. What had made my first year on the West Coast financially viable, the fact that I was for all intents and purposes not working on the West Coast, was now gone. 2010 was going to be rough.

2010, much to my surprise, was far more interesting than I would have first expected.

My friend Mark took over as Artistic Director of a small opera company in the area. We had met a few years before when I was the lighting assistant at SF Opera and he was an assistant director. We had done one show together since that time. As he took over the company he asked if I would light their season. The company was traveling through its own narrow place when Mark took over. The budgets were tightened to the breaking point and they had just lost their long time venue.

Mark found a new venue, twice the size of their last one, and took the reigns of the company directing a new production of Don Giovanni. The show was a hit selling out its brief run and, as if rounding that last corner in a dark tunnel, light began to shine in. I lit three more shows for Mark’s company that year.

The end of the year brought another interesting collaboration. Director Jon Tracy, who had seen my work several times through projects I had done with his fiancee, asked me to light his newest work. The sequel to his, then running, outdoor adaptation of The Iliad. This would be the second chapter, The Odyssey. It was a phenomenal project both on purely artistic merits and for the quality of the collaboration. Of The Earth finished out the year to raving critical success.

While not the best year by economic standards it was quite satisfying creatively.

Finding myself in a bit of a narrow place financially, my deliverance came through creativity. What saved me was, quite literally, the light at the end of the tunnel. A 2K Fresnel perhaps, gelled in L201.

While the financial trials of an American pale next to the struggles of the oppressed to speak freely, they are for each a Mitzrayyim. We can only observe our fellow humans in their tunnels lost in the darkness. It up to each of us, as individuals, to turn our heads away from the past and look up.

Death and Taxes, OK just taxes

Monday, February 7th, 2011

I filed my taxes this weekend. Well, rather I sent all my financial info off to my accountant and he compiled it and let me know how much I owe. A very pleasant number by the way. The whole process took me less than an hour. It was not always this easy.

The first time I freelanced full time, well half a year to be honest, was 2005, the year after I finished gradschool. Half a year at SF Opera and half a year freelancing. I did my taxes myself. Mixed income sources from two states. It was a mess. Having never had most of my income from 1099 sources before I was not prepared for how much I needed to have saved in order to pay the taxes. W2s are easy. Money is withheld at each paycheck and at tax time you settle up the balance. For me I had the whole bill all at once. Yikes!

I spent the next few months stashing everything away until I had enough to pay my, what felt to me, rather large tax bill. There must be an easier way.

The next year I got myself an accountant. Nice guy. Treats his clients on a sliding scale based on income and takes on a lot of artists. “Don’t worry,” he said when I first met with him, “I make my money with investment bankers so I can help guys like you out.” Awesome.

It took me a couple of years to really get my system down in terms of breaking up expenses into categories that make sense, how to notate per diem and travel days for him and so forth. By 2008 I had my system in place.

Now it’s easy. I just email him a text file with all my numbers and he sends me back a dollar amount to be made out to state and/or federal tax boards.

While I said it takes me less than an hour there, in truth, there is a bit more work than that. Sure the final compiling of numbers takes almost no time at all, but I enter data regularly, all year long.

I maintain a spreadsheet to track all my expenses, personal and business. Yes I know I could use quicken or quickbooks or any number of software programs. I like my spreadsheet. I set it up to do various totals and calculations that I find useful or interesting. And the layout works really well for me. Sure it is missing a few bells and whistles and may not be the prettiest of things, but it gets the job done. And done well.

By entering the information regularly, I try to do end of each day, but on busy tech schedules it often gets relegated to Mondays, I only ever have five or ten minutes of work at a time. Usually less.

Spreading the work out over the course of the year was one of the best choices I ever made with managing money. No one likes a huge pile of work. Certainly not me. Yet that was what I faced that first year, and a not-insignificant pile the year or two after as I smoothed out my system. It is no fun. It leads me to waiting until the last minute, because really, sifting through a huge pile of receipts is a fucking pain in the ass. Ten minutes, five minutes, two minutes, no problem.

Learning what is an expense and what is not has been a huge lesson. I am very conservative with my numbers. If there is a grey area I tend to err on the side of not counting it. But one of the best tricks I learned was to organize my life in such a way that I could maximize my expenses.

When I lived in New York nearly all of my friends were business colleagues, designers, directors, choreographers, producers, and a few actors, etc. As such my social life revolved around work and nearly every dinner party, round of drinks, and so on was in the context of talking about one project or another. Nailing down design details or finishing up a few last bits of production meeting at the restaurant or bar was a typical evening. After all, this is New York where most business of this kind happens in public.

California has been quite a bit different. A smaller percentage of my social life is inherently work related. There are fewer late night, post-tech, restaurant excursions. The relative percentage of the categories of expenses has shifted dramatically. A lot are quite a bit less. But then, when I work in New York, I get the highest daily travel allowance the IRS allows. It all balances out.

Navigating taxes is certainly not fun but I have learned quite a bit through trial and error. The most important thing I learned was to get an accountant. In matters of great importance there is no suitable replacement for a professional.


Creative Commons License

All text on this site, unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. All other rights reserved.