I have three shows running tonight. Pick your favorite genre and go see one:
Theatre
Opera
Dance
Archive for the ‘opera’ Category
Pick a show, any show
Friday, July 27th, 2007Aida Opens
Friday, July 20th, 2007Bezerkeley Opera
Thursday, July 19th, 2007It has been a crazy time at Berkeley Opera. Aida is coming along well and I am increasingly pleased with it although the hours have been very demanding.
It will be interesting to see how we are received as this is about as unconventional a production of the work as possible.
I suppose I will find out when I take my bow on Saturday night.
Overlap
Tuesday, May 15th, 2007It feels as though it has has been quite a while since last I posted more than a link and quote. The trip to California was very good, and very packed. I had several meetings that were very productive. I saw several plays. I met with many friends. I celebrated my grandmother’s 94th birthday. All in all it was a lovely trip. And oh my! The weather. I forget sometimes just how wonderful the weather is in the Bay Area.
Things get rather hectic over here at Light Que 23 as of this afternoon. This week we are workshopping Antigona. There will be a reading on Thursday and Friday nights that may or may not have lighting. Details are still TBD as we are primarily focused on Rumania and getting all that stuff together. I think the play is coming together rather nicely. I have not seen anything since last Monday, but the direction it was going when last I saw a rehearsal and by all reports since it should be quite an exciting show.
I have a big design meeting this weekend for Aida. The director, set designer and I will sit down and do a listen through of the piece while discussing scenic and lighting ideas. It should be a good meeting although the piece is long to begin with and once discussion is added in it may well take the better part of the day. I met with the technical director of the theatre when I was in California and was able to figure out several of the quirky aspects to the space that will at least minimize surprises.
Next Monday we load-in for Fate’s Imagination at the Players Theatre. We had a bit of a snafu as the theatre drawings the set designer received were rather deceptive as to where certain walls were located, so the design had to be reworked for the realities of the space. Quite a lot to do so close to a load-in, but so it goes from time to time. At least we found this out before we were in the space thus the only problem is a time crunch rather than a full rebuild and delayed opening.
So much of this work must be taken on faith. Faith that the drawings are correct, that other people are doing their job, that your work on paper bears out in reality. All of this before even considering an audience and the performative aspects of the show. It feels like the work I do is one long series of hypothetical statements punctuated briefly by the answer of opening night. This “answer” as it were is in many if not most ways incidental to the journey of arriving there.
The hectic schedule continues as we leave for Rumania the same day as the first press preview for Fate’s Imagination. So at least with that one I miss the punctuation. I will be working on another show in another country when it opens. I still get a little surprise when that happens despite it being a fairly regular part of my work flow. By the opening the show is done, and usually has been for several performances. My work is and has been over for some time so really it shouldn’t feel strange. Of course a lot of it is the disappointment in missing out on the party.
Color Sense
Tuesday, April 10th, 2007I have been working on the lightplot for the revival of Cinderella with New York Theatre Ballet. Largely the plot is the same as last year. However there were some changes in the house plot at Florence Gould Hall and the repertory program that plays with Cinderella is different so the lightplot has changed some.
I think these are all very beneficial changes. Some things have been streamlined, some others expanded. For the most part it has been a matter of maximizing what is available in the palette. The company prefers a very colorful look. This is a fun aesthetic to work in, but the trick is to get the color sense without using so many colors that the light gets muddy. It is very easy with a lot of color to make costumes look old and dingy. The trick is to have a look that is clean and also shows off the dancers, costumes and scenery to the best advantage.
I love working in heavy color environments. Windows was quite the extreme as far as the use of color goes, but it helps make the point. Often, though, I find that direct saturated colors like that are not what is wanted in a colorful space. More the need of the piece is a sense of color. The feel of color is very different than the direct application of heavily saturated colors themselves.
The color sense of a piece is often a key factor in how a piece if perceived. Medea wanted a terse look. It needed a strong but minimal framework to place around the action of the play. The result was heavy use of shadow, black is a very important color in the lighting designers toolbox, and a very contained color palette. The Last Word . . . , a totally different kind of show, had en even tighter color palette. The color varied by less than 1000 degrees Kelvin, with no black.
New York Theatre Ballet can be a tricky aesthetic to nail down. My experience has been that it works best with a sense of color, but when saturated colors are used they are kept in the background. Saturated colors are very present, purples and blues and greens and reds, but the majority of the color work is “invisible.” That is, the colors are tints. A cool white or a warm white, slightly pink or a touch of amber or a pale blue, but no strong color.
It is the careful mixture of these tints, combined with the selective use of saturated colors, that gives the overall piece its color sense. Color can be a difficult thing to get a hold of. One of my reasons for going to NYU for graduate school is the legendary color lecture of John Gleason carried on by Curt Ostermann. And while this can provide all the rules, it then takes hundreds of experiments and breaking of the rules to really get a grasp on it.
Every play or dance or opera is a kind of experiment. Even revivals. They are never definitive, but always propositions. Will this piece resonate with an audience today? What must be done to make it speak in a language accessible today. In many ways dance is the strongest in this regard. There is an immediacy to dance that is a much less common thing in a play. In Opera it is the rare occurrence that it holds that fresh immediacy, but when it does, it is a sight to behold!
The color sense can be a powerful tool to help bring a piece into a framework accessible to the audience. It is a delicate balance to find what is both true to the work and at the same time pulls the audience into that work in a clear and direct manner. Lots of work, but a hell of a lot of fun too.
inter/national design
Sunday, March 18th, 2007This summer is looking to be quite exciting on the travel front. I will be working outside of New York for several months on a variety of projects. I find traveling to different cities for work to be truly invigorating. The new and changing locales help to give new life to the work I am doing and cause me to think much more fundamentally about the choices I am making in the various works.
In June I will be in Rumania working on the Antigona. This one woman adaptation of the Antigone story is very powerful and I think will be quite exciting. The text is very engaging as is the space we are performing in. I have never been to Rumania so this is quite a new adventure for me. Not only are we performing in Sibiu in the chapel of a fortress, but we might be performing in a bar in Bucharest. There are a few days between these dates, so there will be some nice opportunity for sight seeing. Perhaps even a little bit of travel can be arranged depending upon how the final dates work out.
After that I return to New York to work upstate at Glimmerglass Opera, assisting lighting designer Robert Weirzel. They are doing an entire season of operatic versions of the Orpheus Myth. We are doing Gluck’s Orpheo. I studied with Robert at NYU and have assisted him a number of times in the last few years. Its always fun, so I am greatly looking forward to this.
After Cooperstown I will be traveling to Berkeley, CA to light an opera of my own. I will be lighting a production of Verdi’s Aida with the Berkeley Opera directed by my friend Yuval Sharon. Being from Berkeley it will be a wonderful chance to spend some time with family and friends as well as having the opportunity to work on this rather compelling take on an operatic classic.
After that it is a bit of a mystery. August and September have some interesting prospects although nothing yet is settled. I am in discussions about projects in Scotland and Ireland, but there are still a lot of logistics to figure out. I may have another project in the Bay Area in November, but that too is still in the process of working through logistical questions.
All this travel is certainly thrilling, but before we get there we have a very New York series of shows what with assisting at New York Theatre Workshop, lighting the New York Theatre Ballet, and lighting a play for Gotham Stage Company.
I must say, I really am enjoying 2007.
Technology of the Visible
Monday, January 15th, 2007It’s better than shuffle mode. No really. The future really is a fun place to hang out. It is curious that with all the technology available to us, the essential human really does not change. Biologically we are no different than we were one thousand or even one hundred years ago, and yet the potential of our lives is radically different. Or is it?
Sure there is more plastic and blinky lights, but that is all just cover. It is the superficial. It is the mask we wear. The cultural mask of technology worn by the proto-future. But what do we have behind that mask? Our needs have not really changed. Nor have our emotions. Yet far too often we find ourselves falling into habits formed by and through our use of technology.
I run into this with every project I work on. A light is a light is a light. You can make most any light perform most any function. Within reason. Similar with the lighting control systems. These are often computers, and every one has a unique programming language. Knowing how to use one kind of light allows you to know how to use most any other light. There really is only so much a light can do. Well, you know, anything. But the technology of how you control those lights is much harder to break through the surface.
The San Francisco Opera uses a lighting system that I had not seen since college, and then it was a much more primitive version of the programming language. When I started working there it took me a large part of my first season to really understand the language itself. I kept running into problems where I would want to perform a specific function and it was either not possible or incredibly difficult. And at the same time, things that I was used to being quite complex became very simple.
In the short term, what one could do, at least what one could do efficiently was determined by the technology. In many ways this was restricted to how you could organize information. Through various machinations one could perform the same operations, but how it was done and the order one needed to think in to make it happen were radically divergent.
So what does that mean at a cultural level?
I remember an experiment we did in a psychology class I took in college. Can you connect all nine dots with four straight lines without removing your pencil from the paper?
The results were interesting. The ability to solve the puzzle broke down along culturo-technological lines. The very presence of certain technologies precluded or radically hindered the ability of individuals to solve the puzzle. It changed the way they saw. Certain things, wholly unrelated to the technologies in question, became invisible by the mere presence of those technologies.
How much of our sight is determined by our language? Does the language we use actually hide things from us as much as it reveals.
The music and film industry is freaking out about pirated works. They want to have total control over the licensing and distribution of digital media. It seems to be a losing battle in the long run, and certain people love to point out the misguided foibles of these industries. But perhaps we could look at the issue from another angle. Why do we feel the need to own these things in the first place?
Perhaps we are owned and controlled by the very notion of ownership. It is ingrained in our culture. Happiness is only a metaphor for property. But as technology advances, notions of ownership become more a matter of sentimentality than they do of necessity. Maybe this constitutes a new mode of happiness. Or at least potentially new vectors for discovering it.
Either way, the path is uncertain and obscured. How then does this uncertain and floating reality impact us as human beings? In a world where nothing is real, how do we even find the forest?
To the local bodega to wolf down a hero, son is on a midnight run like Deniro
Friday, November 24th, 2006A problem that had eluded me on the opera plot solved itself almost as soon as I opened the file this morning. It’s nice when that happens. I often find it better to “sleep on” a problem rather than torturing myself over it. This is why I find it useful to work on multiple projects at the same time. As soon as one hits a snag I can switch to another, either dealing with a different iteration of the same problem or something else entirely. Usually this causes the original problem to get solved. The answer is almost always there, you just have to relax into it at times. Wait patiently and it will come out of hiding.
Last night at Thanksgiving dinner there were various cries of “Wow three days off work!” or “Oh darn I have to go to work tomorrow, but at least I can come in late.” And then there was me, “I’ve got to get to work as soon as we get home.” I must say I am very glad I do not have a ‘boss’ who makes me show up in a regimented schedule. Sure during technical rehearsals I need to be at the theatre at certain prescribed times, but so much of the work is done on my own time and in my own schedule it is great. Even if this means working late on a day others consider a holiday.
It’s time to get back to the dance plot once this little break is over. It should be simple enough. I have all the basic ideas worked out. I just need to put them on the rep-plot and be done with it. There are so many variations on the concept of the repertory light plot and each one demands its own approach.
The basic idea behind the repertory light plot is that there is a set basic position and color for the lights in a theatre. Depending upon the venue you can make various changes to some or all of the lights. For Nutcracker I use almost the whole rep plot as drawn and only make a few minor changes to the position of the lights, but then I refocus them all to make them specific to the show and of course the color is all our own. For the dance piece in Williamstown I am making a few color changes and then the plot has a series of dedicated “specials” that can be refocused for each piece. Everything else remains in it’s “rep focus” and color. Theater festival plots vary from a total fixed focus to allowing you to do anything with the light so long as it remains hung in the same location.
There is a specific craft that goes into utilizing repertory plots. The SF Opera has a kind of hybrid system. There is a very extensive rep plot but any light can be focused however the designer wishes, with a few exceptions. On top of that a large number of lights can be added for more specific needs. It was a great experience in my two seasons there as the lighting assistant watching how different designers negotiated that system.
The bid for Becoming Adele should be going out on Monday. The show looks to be simple enough. It’s a lovely little play. A good heartwarming tale for the ‘Holiday Season.’
I have not mentioned here Operation Ajax that I am lighting for The Butane Group. This is a great piece of political theatre dealing with the US backed coup in Iran in 1953. The Eisenhower Administration, that wonderful group of people who systematically overthrew numerous Democratically elected governments in favor of repressive authoritarian regimes. You know, the guys who set in motion a series of events that led to radical hostility and animosity towards the United States from the Middle East, South America and more. Wonderful people.
I have not worked with The Butane Group before, although I was approached to light a show of theirs several years ago, I had a conflict. I seem to remember I was working in San Francisco at the time. Anyhow, they do some interesting work. I saw a workshop of a piece in progress a few months ago that I really enjoyed. If you want to get a sense of their work they have an audio piece available here.
I guess February is the month of political theatre as I am also working on a production of Mad Forest. And November, the month of only using rap lyrics in my subject headings, is nearly over.
Picture me Rollin’
Wednesday, November 22nd, 2006Here is a picture of last January’s Seven Deadly Sins that I had not seen before.






