Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Gray Fluffy Clouds

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

If you enjoyed last week’s song, you will certaintly appreciate this:

Little Fluffy Clouds

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

To break up all this color theory, I wanted to present you with a song about light and color and clouds here:

Color Theory Basics – Color Correction

Monday, January 18th, 2010

Film and Television has a need for accuracy with regards to color that does not translate to the stage. When on location, and shooting a scene where the primary illumination is the sun, it is often necessary to augment that light with artificial sources. The Director of Photography wants the artificial light to blend seamlessly with the natural sunlight, so they must precisely alter the color of the artificial light. Or, perhaps a scene is being shot inside a room with views to the outside. The human eye will notice the table lamp is a little more Amber and the light through the window a little more Blue. A camera will see a huge difference. In order to make the camera see these two lights as being variants on “White Light” it is necessary to use precise color filters to transform these lights into the appropriate color temperature. This is the film equivalent of Missing Color Syndrome.

Enter the world of Color Correction.

Color Correction is the general term for filters which turn incandescent lights to daylight (CTB or Color Temperature Blue), daylight to incandescent (CTO or Color Temperature Orange), fluorescent to daylight (Minus Green), and daylight to fluorescent (Plus Green). While in a filmic setting this topic could cover several posts, because I am dealing with color theory for stage lighting, we will address this all in a single essay.

CTB filters are probably the most commonly used Color Correction filters in stage lighting today. With the introduction of HMI Fresnels into live performance there arose a need to precisely balance the color of traditional incandescent lighting sources against these new Daylight discharge sources. Aside from the formal aesthetics of the light itself, these Hues provide the designer with a range of colors that look very good along the entire spectrum of human skin tones, as well as nearly all costumes. This has led to a shift in contemporary design towards a cool and clean stage picture which employs a range of CTB filters.

Let us return to our Rosco color correction from the discussion on Saturation. We can see that the colors range from nearly White to a nice cool Blue. The penultimate color, R3202, converts incandescent sources to Daylight (direct sunlight). The next color, R3220, is closer to the Blue Sky in which the sun hangs. Because different lights will be warmer or cooler we have a range of filters to fit every need.

Lee makes a similar range of colors. The difference between them is that Rosco colors tend to have a little more red in them, and are thus more recessive than the Lee colors which have a bit of Green and are more dominant. Returning to the needs of Film, Lee colors are more accurate, and are used more regularly. On the stage, the Rosco colors can be more effective because of the warmer tones on human skin. Knowing these distinctions it becomes possible to construct very clean palettes within a very tight range of colors that will give us all the effects we want from Dominant and Recessive Colors yet appears as Daylight to an audience.

Going about in this manner we might use L201 (Full CTB) in our Backlight to give a strong dominant color choice for that angle. For our Sidelight then, wanting to be a bit less saturated so as to maintain skintones and costume colors, we might choose L202 (1/2 CTB). This color has the added benefit of giving us a high dynamic range of color temperatures. When the light is at full intensity is a cool and crisp light. As we dim it, the light source gets warmer and more Amber such that we can use these lights for warm intimate scenes as well. For our Frontlight we might want something close to Clear incandescent light. But, remembering what we learned about Missing Color Syndrome would want a color in a sympathetic Hue to the rest of our Palette. Perhaps we would choose an R3216 (1/8 CTB), a more recessive version of this same family of colors.

When working with HMI, or similar discharge sources which produce a cold light, we can use these same ideas in reverse. Thus we might use a 1/8 CTO Backlight, 1/2 CTO Sidelight and Full CTO Frontlight. Similar to the CTB, the distiction between Rosco and Lee is the same. Rosco tends towards Red while Lee tends towards Green.

These same ideas and principles apply to the use of Plus Green and Minus Green filters. The Minus Green filters have the added benefit of working as a precise range of colors when solving Missing Color Syndrome or trying to balance out a followspot (which tend to be cold and a bit Green) against a majority incandescent light plot.

Just as the more visible technology we use in the lighting industry has made tremendous advances in terms of intelligent lighting, show control, rigging, and so forth, so too has the world of color technology. Time was even the level of control considered necessary for film was nowhere near as precise as it is now. Today, color technology has advanced to the level of precision where we can convert the color of newer quartz lamps (like those found in Source-4s) to traditional incandescent lamps with filters like R302.

The world of color correction is, on its own, as broad and varied as the whole world of color. Simply fine tuning color work within these ranges can be an experiment years in the making. Some designers have made whole careers with a palette that hardly diverges from this range.

If you are new to the world of Color Correction I would strongly encourage you to start exploring. Compare analogous colors like L201 and R3202 and see what distinctions you can make. Do all the colors from a particular manufacturer vary only in Saturation or is there variance in Hue as well?

I hope you found this useful. Please take any new ideas and start experimenting. We will continue to build on these concepts throughout this series. Stay tuned.

Was this useful to you? Please let me know what you thought in comments.

Color Theory Basics – Dominant and Recessive Colors

Friday, January 15th, 2010

Close your eyes.

Imagine yourself hiking through the hills. You have been walking amidst some trees for a while and come to a clearing. It’s a few hours after noon and you notice the sun has begun its progression towards the Western horizon. In front of you are more trees crisply limned in the mid-afternoon sunlight. You look a further on towards the mountains in the distance and notice that these same trees and brush appear bathed in a pale lavender light.

You may now open your eyes.

The human eye, having evolved over millions of years with these lighting effects present, has learned to process certain colors as being in either the foreground or the background. The crisp 5700K sunlight is an indicator to our eyes that something is in the foreground. A soft and delicate lavender is an indicator to our eyes that something is far off in the distance. The former dominates our field of view, while the latter recedes into the background.

Beyond evolution, Dominant and Recessive Colors have another interesting property as well. Dominant Colors tend to hold their integrity as colors when in the presence of other colors. Recessive Colors willingly and readily mix in with other colors to either disappear entirely or form third colors.

Probably the clearest example of a dominant color would be Cyan. No matter what you do, it will always be Cyan. You can add Blue to make it more Blue, or Green to make it more Green, but it will always be Cyan, dominant and in the foreground. At the opposite extreme we have Lavender. No matter what other color you turn on, your Lavender will do its level best to mix with that color and recede into the background.

Knowing that some colors are inherently perceived as being in the foreground, while others are perceived as being in the background, gives us tremendous opportunity to sculpt our stage picture and focus the eye where we want it to go.

To reiterate, a Dominant Color will push a figure forwards while a Recessive Color will cause a figure to recede into the distance. The example of ABT’s lightplot, from our discussion on Missing Color Syndrome, applies here as well. The R70 in the Backlight is a Dominant Color which, being Backlight, helps to push our dancer towards us and sculpts the outline of their body. The R51 Frontlight allows us to see them, but the color quickly receeds into whatever else we might have turned on, perhaps some L201 Shins. In this way we can use Frontlight for facial illumination without sacrificing the sculptural qualities of our Backlight and Sidelight.

Backlight and Sidelight are Dominant Angles. They are very powerful and present in a way that a Recessive Angle like Frontlight is not. Using Dominant Colors in Dominant Angles and Recessive Colors in Recessive Angles, as we see in the ABT Repertory Plot, can create striking effects.

Let us now explore these ideas with our Woman-in-a-Red-Dress. Having lit her in Magenta (dominant) Backlight and Lavender (recessive) Frontlight we have created a look whereby our ingenue is front and center in our visual focus, her face is clearly lit and her body is sharply outlined against the scenery. We now have to light the other people in the scene who are watching her. Perhaps we use the same Frontlight system but turn on the Congo Blue (recessive) Backlight. They will all be clearly visible, but our eye will naturally be drawn to the Woman-in-a-Red-Dress. This is true even if she is way upstage of them!

The use of Dominant and Recessive Colors, in conjunction with Dominant and Recessive Angles, helps to create a sense of focus for the eye in much the same way that a camera can put foregound or background figures into focus. In short, we control our depth of field through these tools and thus compose our stage pictures to reflect the key objects we should be looking at in a given light cue.

With these distinctions in mind it could be easy to question why we would use Recessive colors at all. If we want to create powerful and dynamic stage pictures, then everything should be Dominant. Right? It is healthy to be wary of Recessive Colors. One could easily design a palette which looks great in the studio but, when put into practice, makes it impossible to see anyone clearly. The key here is to use colors judiciously and correctly.

At the same time, while it is good to embrace bold Dominant Color choices, do not get carried away. The eye gets tired. Further, you could find yourself having trouble losing focus on a secondary area of the stage. Be bold, but know when to temper your passions.

Remember the first rule of lighting; everything is relative.

One could construct a plot out of all Recessive Colors (I have done it many times). Because some colors are more recessive than others you could create many of the same effects through using colors that are less recessive in the Backlight and more recessive in the Frontlight. There are plenty of delicate ballets and whimsical musicals which call for just such a color palette.

Knowing the distinctions between Dominant and Recessive Colors is a critical tool in composing our looks for the stage. If you missed my essays on Hue or Saturation and Chroma I would encourage you to go back and read them through. In later posts I will be exploring Color Correction, Gray, The Effect of Lamp Type, and Additive vs. Subtractive color mixing.

I hope you found this useful. Please take any new ideas and start experimenting. We will continue to build on these concepts throughout this series. Stay tuned.

Was this useful to you? Please let me know what you thought in comments.

They Might Be Giants on Color Theory

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010

Check out this video for an entertaining and succinct explanation of Hue:

Enjoy!

The Spectrum Song

Friday, January 8th, 2010

If all the words about color theory are too much for you perhaps this song will be a nice reprieve:

test – ignore

Tuesday, July 7th, 2009

3mp7briz6f

Artistic Brain Drain

Thursday, April 23rd, 2009

Link

Leaving Your Mark

Tuesday, April 21st, 2009

Amazing!

Journalism and The Revolution

Monday, March 16th, 2009

Link

That is what real revolutions are like. The old stuff gets broken faster than the new stuff is put in its place. The importance of any given experiment isn’t apparent at the moment it appears; big changes stall, small changes spread. Even the revolutionaries can’t predict what will happen. Agreements on all sides that core institutions must be protected are rendered meaningless by the very people doing the agreeing. (Luther and the Church both insisted, for years, that whatever else happened, no one was talking about a schism.) Ancient social bargains, once disrupted, can neither be mended nor quickly replaced, since any such bargain takes decades to solidify.

And so it is today. When someone demands to know how we are going to replace newspapers, they are really demanding to be told that we are not living through a revolution. They are demanding to be told that old systems won’t break before new systems are in place. They are demanding to be told that ancient social bargains aren’t in peril, that core institutions will be spared, that new methods of spreading information will improve previous practice rather than upending it. They are demanding to be lied to.

There are fewer and fewer people who can convincingly tell such a lie.


Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.6.1, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.

Creative Commons License

All text and images on this site unless otherwise noted are licensed under a Creative Commons License.