Posts Tagged ‘medea’

From the Archives: The Freedom of Minimalism

Friday, March 12th, 2010

Note: This post originally appeared here in 2007.

The aesthetics of Minimalism are at once precise and freeing. Precise because as one removes extraneous elements from a work what remains takes on increasing significance. Freeing because the relationships are so clear that one can shift and recombine them in a multitude of ways allowing the multiplicity of experience to shine through.

mondrian_albero_rosso

So often the theatre is dominated by a kind of maximalism. A desire to put everything possible into a single work as if by desperation trying to contain all of experience in a few hours performance. The result is often the opposite of what is intended. Rather that giving the fullness of experience, each element is diminished as it all fades into a wash of gray, bland and undistinguished.

This is not to say that minimalism does not employ a rigid and tightly controlled grayscale, but it does so knowing that the fullness of each of those few grays will come across. The depth and subtlety of slight variation becomes a thing of power and strength rather than a faltering weakness.

Mondrian-apple-tree

To work from a minimalist aesthetic requires rigor and discipline. Because while there is a great deal of freedom, if any single element is out of place the work implodes under the weight of its own delicate structure.

Every move must be precise and calculated. At the same time one must allow for room to breathe. For play. Minimalism defines itself not in relation to itself but in relation to the varied multiplicity of the world around it. A blank page only appears blank when surrounded by the frantic modern world. Taken on its own the blank white page is a universe unto itself, filled with color and texture and infinite stories. The filled page is far more fixed and reduced in scale by comparison.

Mondrian-Composition_II-1913

It is interesting to me how much the theatre of the Greeks lends itself to a minimalist aesthetic. When I worked on Medea we employed a very strict minimalism with incredibly slight changes in angle or color. With Antigone we opened up the palette more allowing for greater, yet still a very slight, range of color. This control of the color palette cause the shifts in angle and direction of the light to be quite significant.

ryb

In a minimalist aesthetic one often takes a single characteristic or element that remains static around which all other elements rotate. In painting perhaps one employs the use of strict linearity but then gives great variety and contrast to the colors, with vibrant and bold strokes.

In Antigone a tightly controlled color palette gave rise to a great variety in angle, direction and shadow. The simplicity of the setting allowed for a high contrast with the costume. Finding these points of control is what makes possible the freedom in a minimalist work. A clear centerpoint is the basis of minimalism.

All content Copyleft - LucasKrech.com, please Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • email

The Freedom of Minimalism

Tuesday, June 12th, 2007

The aesthetics of Minimalism are at once precise and freeing. Precise because as one removes extraneous elements from a work what remains takes on increasing significance. Freeing because the relationships are so clear that one can shift and recombine them in a multitude of ways allowing the multiplicity of experience to shine through.

mondrian_albero_rosso

So often the theatre is dominated by a kind of maximalism. A desire to put everything possible into a single work as if by desperation trying to contain all of experience in a few hours performance. The result is often the opposite of what is intended. Rather that giving the fullness of experience, each element is diminished as it all fades into a wash of gray, bland and undistinguished.

This is not to say that minimalism does not employ a rigid and tightly controlled grayscale, but it does so knowing that the fullness of each of those few grays will come across. The depth and subtlety of slight variation becomes a thing of power and strength rather than a faltering weakness.

Mondrian-apple-tree

To work from a minimalist aesthetic requires rigor and discipline. Because while there is a great deal of freedom, if any single element is out of place the work implodes under the weight of its own delicate structure.

Every move must be precise and calculated. At the same time one must allow for room to breathe. For play. Minimalism defines itself not in relation to itself but in relation to the varied multiplicity of the world around it. A blank page only appears blank when surrounded by the frantic modern world. Taken on its own the blank white page is a universe unto itself, filled with color and texture and infinite stories. The filled page is far more fixed and reduced in scale by comparison.

Mondrian-Composition_II-1913

It is interesting to me how much the theatre of the Greeks lends itself to a minimalist aesthetic. When I worked on Medea we employed a very strict minimalism with incredibly slight changes in angle or color. With Antigone we opened up the palette more allowing for greater, yet still a very slight, range of color. This control of the color palette makes the shifts in angle and direction of the light became quite significant.

ryb

In a minimalist aesthetic one often takes a single characteristic or element that remains static around which all other elements rotate. In painting perhaps one employs the use of strict linearity but then gives great variety and contrast to the colors, with vibrant and bold strokes.

In Antigone a tightly controlled color palette gave rise to a great variety in angle, direction and shadow. The simplicity of the setting allowed for a high contrast with the costume. Finding these points of control is what makes possible the freedom in a minimalist work. A clear centerpoint is the basis of minimalism.

All content Copyleft - LucasKrech.com, please Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • email

Color Sense

Tuesday, April 10th, 2007

I have been working on the lightplot for the revival of Cinderella with New York Theatre Ballet. Largely the plot is the same as last year. However there were some changes in the house plot at Florence Gould Hall and the repertory program that plays with Cinderella is different so the lightplot has changed some.

I think these are all very beneficial changes. Some things have been streamlined, some others expanded. For the most part it has been a matter of maximizing what is available in the palette. The company prefers a very colorful look. This is a fun aesthetic to work in, but the trick is to get the color sense without using so many colors that the light gets muddy. It is very easy with a lot of color to make costumes look old and dingy. The trick is to have a look that is clean and also shows off the dancers, costumes and scenery to the best advantage.

I love working in heavy color environments. Windows was quite the extreme as far as the use of color goes, but it helps make the point. Often, though, I find that direct saturated colors like that are not what is wanted in a colorful space. More the need of the piece is a sense of color. The feel of color is very different than the direct application of heavily saturated colors themselves.

The color sense of a piece is often a key factor in how a piece if perceived. Medea wanted a terse look. It needed a strong but minimal framework to place around the action of the play. The result was heavy use of shadow, black is a very important color in the lighting designers toolbox, and a very contained color palette. The Last Word . . . , a totally different kind of show, had en even tighter color palette. The color varied by less than 1000 degrees Kelvin, with no black.

New York Theatre Ballet can be a tricky aesthetic to nail down. My experience has been that it works best with a sense of color, but when saturated colors are used they are kept in the background. Saturated colors are very present, purples and blues and greens and reds, but the majority of the color work is “invisible.” That is, the colors are tints. A cool white or a warm white, slightly pink or a touch of amber or a pale blue, but no strong color.

It is the careful mixture of these tints, combined with the selective use of saturated colors, that gives the overall piece its color sense. Color can be a difficult thing to get a hold of. One of my reasons for going to NYU for graduate school is the legendary color lecture of John Gleason carried on by Curt Ostermann. And while this can provide all the rules, it then takes hundreds of experiments and breaking of the rules to really get a grasp on it.

Every play or dance or opera is a kind of experiment. Even revivals. They are never definitive, but always propositions. Will this piece resonate with an audience today? What must be done to make it speak in a language accessible today. In many ways dance is the strongest in this regard. There is an immediacy to dance that is a much less common thing in a play. In Opera it is the rare occurrence that it holds that fresh immediacy, but when it does, it is a sight to behold!

The color sense can be a powerful tool to help bring a piece into a framework accessible to the audience. It is a delicate balance to find what is both true to the work and at the same time pulls the audience into that work in a clear and direct manner. Lots of work, but a hell of a lot of fun too.

All content Copyleft - LucasKrech.com, please Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • email

Overlap

Wednesday, August 23rd, 2006

I think I spend as much time dealing with scheduling as I do actually working on my projects. The next few months are going to be hectic.

Berkeley is an amazing little town. Birthplace to many notable characters including myself. It has, across the street from each other, my favorite record shop and bookstore in the whole wide world. They are not the largest by any streatch of the imagination, but as for pure quality I really do not think they can be beat. And any bookstore that, following one wall, you go from Buddhism, to Theater, to Dance, to Film, to Philosophy is all right by me.

If you like DJ Music this is highly worth listening to. Smart and funny scratch DJ’s are the way to go. Because “ignoring the DJ in Hip-Hop is like ignoring the guitar in Rock&Roll.”

I was thinking about the Caribean, so I give you this picture from my Medea from last August.

Medea with Chorus

All content Copyleft - LucasKrech.com, please Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • email

Brecht would be proud

Monday, July 17th, 2006

I saw the Rapid Response Team perform last night. It was quite excellent. Unashamed political art. A rollicking good time. Having a waitress come through taking drink orders sure helped keep the crowd lively. The laughter was almost continuous. Much of Eastern Blogistan was in the house; George, Dan, James, and of course Isaac.

RRT was a great way to end the day. Yesterday felt quite long. I had two meetings for two separate shows. One, ‘a play with music’ for the NY Fringe Festival, called The Unlucky Man with the Yellow Cap and the other a workshop for a production of Ajax that will eventually be presented in Rumania in 2007. Every play that I have coming up deals with war, torture or both. While it may be sad for the state of the world, it is encouraging for the state of the Arts. All we need now are politicians who can be more than mere mouthpieces for Trans-Global Corporations.

In other news, the premier of the making-of documentary about the Medea I lit last August is being screened next month. I will be unable to attend as the company is not providing plane fare to San Juan for the event. If any of you will be in Puerto Rico in mid-August, it should be fun.

Also, my sister is funny:

All content Copyleft - LucasKrech.com, please Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • email

On Theatre as Global Art

Thursday, June 22nd, 2006

Why do we care about the Greeks? I often ask myself this when reading through stilted translations whose language is self-consciously old fashioned. These plays were written within a socio-historical context so radically different than ours it becomes almost impossible to try and relate the two. The only real similarities are that we read some of the same authors. I guess we have a similar political system since power is vested only in the hands of wealthy land owning white males. But even there the differences arise as the Greeks were up front about this while we mask it in language of universal suffrage. But I digress.

I am currently in the process of working on two greek texts, Antigone and Ajax. The Antigone is a new translation of the Anhouilh adaptation while the Ajax is an as yet unfinished adaptation of the Greek into Rumanian. These two productions are as different as can be and yet they both pull from some common source, some need to look back.

It always amazes me that these texts hold such strong relevance for a modern audience. But in a way it is not a looking back so much as it is a locating of ones foundation or grounding. For these texts never are the final product, rather they are the jumping off point for an exploration of our contemporary condition. The text becomes contained within a larger experiential context, the production. By using these old texts we immediately find ourselves in the world of metaphor. We know we are talking about the contemporary world, but it is through the veil of history. We are instantly looking at parallels between then and now, us and them. This creates a situation whereby notions of time and identity are at once compressed and expanded. We live and operate beyond the linear qualities of time that daily life presents us with.

One of the reasons I feel that places like New York or Chicago or London or Berlin have such strong artistic and theatrical communities is that daily life is confronted with these very issues. The simple fact of living in a heterogenous cosmopolitan environment lends a vital force to the simple repetition of daily life that one does not get outside of these places. When I worked on Medea this vitality was inherent to the process. Everyone involved was either a full time or part time New Yorker, but all non-native to New York. At the same time everyone except for me was a native of Puerto Rico. We were handling a Greek text translated into English and then adapted and retranslated into Spanish.

The work was performed in a space that had never before seen a performance. But more interestingly, the space was a cross roads. We performed in the open area between the cannon batteries and the kitchen of a 16th Century Spanish fortress. The physical space itself embodied the very psycho-emotional tensions created from these culturally layered situations.

Ajax will be performed in Europe after a workshop production in New York. In this way a further mix of old and new world will come out in the setting and performance. But I find more importantly that this explodes the idea of locality and community. Sure there are communities that are geographically determined, but these are quickly becoming, if not obsolete, at least secondary to the regular functioning of human life. The rise of new and evolving technologies show that we must reconceive the very notion of community. After all, my community is New York. But it is also the San Francisco Bay Area. But it is also the theatre, dance and opera worlds which spans the globe. My community is also the theatre blogosphere which again is not geographically determined but rather determined by thought and ideas. The global underground of rave communities further places me in a community that is bounded by philosophy rather than geography.

To say that theatre must be local because it must be oriented towards community fails to address the very nature of community in the 21st century and risks causing us to stand still at the threshold of possibility. Rather we must take a more expansive stance and see that we live in a world of radical cross-polination. We live in a world that demands of us to look beyond the simple geographical boundaries that have limited human thought for millennia. Theatre allows us to live simultaneously in ancient Greece, 16th century Colonial Spain, contemporary New York and Puerto Rico. But this possibility exists only if we lift ourselves out of the geographical determinism of the past and fully embrace the borderless potential of contemporary existence.

All content Copyleft - LucasKrech.com, please Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • email

Creative Commons License

All text and images on this site unless otherwise noted are licensed under a Creative Commons License.