Posts Tagged ‘painting’

Enjoy the Sunlight

Friday, April 16th, 2010

I often joke about how as a lighting designer I never actually get to see the sun because I am stuck inside theaters all day long. While this is not wholly accurate there is a degree of truth to it that is in many ways less than ideal. While many to most of my designs are not attempts at naturalistic recreations of daylight, even the abstract work is grounded in an understanding of natural light.

Before I got into lighting design I was an avid photographer. This was back in the ancient days of film photography where, rather than sitting in front of a computer screen, the photographer would spend hours in a darkroom manipulating the light that passed through a negative to create an image on paper. I remember spending an entire weekend teaching myself split filter processing in order to make a not so good negative into a rather stellar print, because I loved the composition so much.

My point in mentioning this is that I spent a lot of time, energy, and attention studying light before I ever started manipulating it directly on stage. This ties in to the idea I discussed Monday in my post On Visual Thinking. To be a visual artist one must first learn to see. We must train our mind to think with our eyes and not just with words. We must be able to take in the visual world and analyze it for form, shadow, contrast, composition and the like. Once we have the ability to directly analyze the visual world, then we can begin to make art.

I see a lot of designers get caught up in the technology of lighting, because it is really cool stuff, to the detriment of the art of lighting. Certainly there is a time and place for high tech, but if one does not understand the medium itself, light, then all the technology in the world will not create a work of beauty. Neither a fancy drafting program nor a fancy lighting console will make you a better designer.

I see a similar problem with photographers. I brought a friend in to shoot a recent show of mine because I was less than thrilled with the company’s house photographer. I overheard the company photographer say something like “those will be good photographs, he has a really nice camera.” And right there I knew why the house photographer was not very good. He mistook the technology for the art. A good photographer can make beautiful work from a polaroid if need be. The art does not come from the machine.

In lighting we can get so caught up with Eos and Source-4 and Vectorworks and Lightwright that we forget what we are doing is manipulating light. Some of the most interesting work I have done came from limitations like a dozen dimmers and a small hand full of plugstrips to control fluorescents and A-lamps.

Even color, a subject I love, is secondary to effective lighting. When, as a designer, you have a clear understanding of how light moves and how light is perceived, you can do amazing things with very little. It also means that when you have a quarter million dollar lighting package you can really push it to make some truly amazing and spectacular creations.

But before learning about how to program a lighting console, before memorizing gel books and gobo catalogues, before reading every lighting textbook theory, before knowing the intricate details of every new automated lighting fixture on the market, you need to step outside and enjoy the sunlight. Get your eyes off the stage and onto the work of the most amazing lighting designer you will ever encounter. Nature. Observe the difference between 4:30 in the afternoon during the summer and during the winter. What are the colors of a sunrise in the plains vs. on the coast? How do sunsets differ in New York and Los Angeles? Does the shade of a forest differ from the shade on a porch?

Just as painters use real models to create portraits, so too must lighting designers have a real understanding of light in order to make truly powerful creations. If your options are limited, perhaps you can’t travel, or work or school take up too much of your daytime, then explore light in books. Discover the world of black and white photography or classical European painting. You can learn almost as much about light and shadow from Paul Strand or Caravaggio as you can by stepping outside for a few hours. But you will need to step outside and see for yourself to truly develop your own voice.

Seeing for yourself will lead you to create your own visual language. You will start learning words and phrases. You will decipher your own grammar and syntax. As you begin to look with your own eyes and analyze the light in the world around you, your eye will develop and become increasingly subtle in its distinctions and degrees of understanding. You will see more detail. And every day you will enjoy the sunlight more.

All content Copyleft - LucasKrech.com, please Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • email

An approach to Composition – Lighting the performer

Monday, March 22nd, 2010

One of the most difficult things to talk about with regards to lighting design is composition. Part of this is due to the fact that light is so ephemeral that even with pictures and illustrations the ideas are slippery. As a result, most discussions of composition fall into explorations of lighting angles and their effect on the human figure. While this is necessary information, its utility is limited. Composition is more than knowing what backlight does or what red does. It is knowing what and how these fit together into a larger whole. I approached issues of composition indirectly in my series on color theory but again, this was looking exclusively at color rather than taking an integrated approach and extracting a theory. What I will be looking at in this brief series is a general approach, or orientation, to thinking about composition.

Many of my ideas about composition stem from my earliest artistic endeavors. When I was a child I loved the game Dungeons and Dragons. I played regularly, read over the rule books incessantly, but of import to this post, I painted lead figures with the zeal of a fanatic. By the time I was a teenager I had become good enough at painting these 1″ fantasy figures that I was selling them at the local games shop to fund my painting habit (I was an early entrepreneur). I painted countless hundreds of these figures. Self taught in that realm, I developed a system for approaching their painting which maps almost perfectly to lighting design and has guided my thinking as a designer, in some form or another, since I started.

The figures themselves are made of lead, or some other soft metal. The first step is to prime the metal for the application of paint. Either a grey or black primer would be used, typically black, as it would help to deepen the shadows. Once primed and dry, the first layers of paint would be applied. These would be the broad, general, colors of each main area, perhaps a dark brown for the tunic and leggings, a green for the cape, medium blue for the skin (these are fantasy figures after all), and yellow for the hair. This would be the first phase. It gives a basic outline of the look of the figure.

Phase two deals with shadow and tone. Once the basic colors are dry I would apply a toning wash to the different areas. This would be a similar hue as the base color but often darker and slightly cooler. The paint itself would be greatly watered down, to allow it to concentrate in the valleys and folds of the figure, and have less of an impact on the areas of highlight. The brown for the clothes might have a little black added to it. The green for the cape would get some blue. To the blue of the skin I would add some red. For the yellow hair, orange.

Once all the shadow washes were dry, I would go back over the various areas with the original color using a drybrush technique to bring that color back. I would then go over that with progressively lighter drybrush layers to really make the highlights and shadows have a strong contrast. As I was highlighting, I would use split compliments to heighten the contrast. So if the toning for the green cape added blue, then I would add yellow to the base color for the highlights. This general outline yields strongly contrasting shadows and highlights, and gives the figure a distinctive look.

The final touch would be detail elements like belts and belt buckles, eyes, fingernails, jewelry, and other small items. Once all that was complete, the whole figure would get sprayed with a clear sealant to protect the paint.

Lighting for the stage follows the exact same structure. First, we prime the space by turning off all the lights and creating a darkened stage. Second we turn on our primary visibility lights. Depending on your approach these may be frontlight or they may be sidelight. Or something else entirely. Once we can see our performer, we address the shadows. This is typically done through a low front position, a backlight position, or a high sidelight position. When the shadows are complete, we turn to highlights. These might be low sidelights for example. The result is a composition rich in texture and a figure that is fully dimensional.

Depending on the tone of the show, the treatment of shadows and highlights will vary. In a musical comedy, the visibility light might be diagonal front lights in R53. The shadow/toning lights an L079 from the balcony rail and an L180 backlight. The highlights, a high side in L152 and R302 Head hi booms. In a dark minimalist opera, the visibility light might be clear head his, the shadows darkness, and the highlights L201 shins.

While the specifics of color and angle will vary depending upon the needs of the production, the general approach remains constant. As lighting designers for live performance, we are concerned with visibility, shadow, and highlight. Having a clear framework to approach composition is a powerful tool that allows the designer to clearly and directly approach a work.

In my next post I will continue with part two of this series, Lighting the Scenery.

What did you think of this post? Please let me know in comments.

All content Copyleft - LucasKrech.com, please Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • email

Stories and Inspiration

Sunday, April 2nd, 2006

It’s Greek Day in Astoria, so I thought I would begin with a few words on that Spanish painter El Greco.

El Greco is a painter who truly understands light. He recognizes the power of light and shade and uses it to illuminate the most profound of human truths. In his hand light can not be a mundane thing. Even when the light comes from a specific source, sun or candle or angel it is no mundane thing. El Greco understood that light must simultaneously be the candle and a reflection of the human soul. It is both inner and outer truth.

There are many painters who do this and I am not making claim to some hierarchy of value. Rather I am considering his vision as one rigorously disciplined and always maintaining a clarity of purpose. Like Prospero, Domenikos Theotokopoulos was a spiritual exile in his native land. For both of them it took exile, one forced and the other self imposed, in order to achieve the fullness of their vision.

The chiseled faces in El Greco’s work speak to a spiritual striving that never quite reaches fulfillment. A striving that perhaps achieves its goal and as a result sees even farther than before. A striving that is always forward and never resting. The clouds of uncertainty broken by the burning wings of an angel.

Linguistic communication requires both speaker and listener to have a common background. A mutually agreed upon set of signs and signifiers such that speech and understanding may occur. When discussing visual language the same is not necessarily the case. Sure Artaud misunderstood the complex system of signs in Balanese dance just as Brecht misunderstood the Carefully constructed Daoist symbolism in Chinese opera. Yet each of them in their own way were affected by these systems and able to take away a powerful experience. And while there may have been a literal misunderstanding, there was, functionally, a powerful and transformative communication.

El Greco had to move to Catholic Spain for his work to be fully understood. Chagall, a Russian Jew, needed Paris. In the same way Brecht and Artaud both needed to lose their native language to find a deep inspiration so too may a deep inspiration need to lose its native language.

This, in many ways, is the power of dance and opera. Opera, even when you speak the language, may only communicate a small subset of the actual words. The emotional and energetic arc of the piece is carried musically. It is the music and the staging that tells the story. The words are there for plot not story. It is the poetry and music that is alive. When the plot is forgotten, the true story gets told. When Mimi stops talking about her job and sings “I stay alone in my tiny white room, I look at the roofs and the sky. But when spring comes the sun’s first rays are mine. April’s first kiss is mine, is mine!” Then the story is told.

The Situationists were fond of the Derive, the random goalless walk through a city, for this very reason. It is only when the goal is forgotten that it can be achieved. When the plot is pulled away, then the story can be revealed. Joseph Campbell might argue there are a finite number of plots. And he may well be correct. But there is an infinite number of stories that can be told.

All content Copyleft - LucasKrech.com, please Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • email

Creative Commons License

All text and images on this site unless otherwise noted are licensed under a Creative Commons License.