Posts Tagged ‘theatre’

Inside the Design Idea – The Sisters Rosensweig

Friday, December 25th, 2009

I wrote last week about a few projects I am working on that have embraced an aesthetic of minimalism in their productions due to budgetary issues. But how do these ideas arise? More importantly how do they develop into a final product? I have written generically about my design process but I thought it might be fun to explore a single project more in depth to see how these ideas make it to the stage.

I was approached by Aaron Davidman, Artistic Director of The Jewish Theater – San Francisco, to light his production of Wendy Wasserstein’s The Sisters Rosensweig for their 2010 season. I had never read or seen the play so my first read for this production was my first time ever through the play. I had no preconceived notions of what it was about or how it “should” look. So I sat down with the text and began to read the play fresh.

Upon that first read I was struck with how important time is to the play. It takes place over a 36 hour period and all the action occurs in the same location. It is almost Greek in its unity of time, place, and action. As a lighting designer time of day is a central concern when working through the text. While location is important it is not central in the same way that time is. Even when the work is highly abstracted there needs to be some unity of expressing a changing time of day. Because time plays such a central role in the storytelling of Sisters Rosensweig I became instantly curious about how to provide that.

The script calls for a rather elaborate setting inside a well furnished apartment. While the action takes place in this well furnished apartment what is more central to the dramatic storytelling is that everything happens in the same room. I proposed to Aaron that we consider setting the play on a rather minimal set and utilize lighting conventions borrowed from the dance world to approach the piece. He readily welcomed the idea and we set out with our scenic designer to craft this world.

I find that audiences respond quite favorably to naturalistic plays happening on abstracted settings. When abstracted in the right way, such that the core storytelling elements are highlighted, the abstraction makes the reality of the characters resonate strongly. One trouble that can arise in naturalistic settings is that the characters get lost amidst the scenery. While it is a perfect approach for film, strict naturalism can impede an audience’s ability to process natural dialog. Abstract minimalism takes the benefits of abstraction even further and gives the audience a clear focus on the actors. After all the audience pays to see actors not well executed scenery, beautiful costumes, or fancy lighting.

As we developed our setting for Sisters Rosensweig we were very careful to create a space and develop ideas that will always keep our focus on the performer. A white rectangle set against a black floor to bound our room filled with a few simple furniture pieces, a staircase, and a chandelier all backed by a large and expansive sky. The sky, truly a white cyc, will be variously lit to show the passage of day into night and back into day. The performers will be clearly and cleanly lit and set against this shifting sky.

Through a clear focus on the performance we will create a visual space which can ebb and flow along with the emotional moment of the play. Each of the seven scenes take place at a slightly different time of day. In order to show these transformations the cyc will be lit variously from the top and bottom in a range of colors from morning pastels, to cool gray midday clouds, to nothing late at night. A shifting sun will illuminate the cyc variously from the sides as well as low and center on the horizon for an evening sunset.

While the sky will be changing behind us, the performers will be lit in cool shades of gray. Keeping the light on the actors in a tight color range of 3400° K – 5700° K will provide a clean and crisp look appropriate for both the sharp witted comedy as well as the darker moments of the piece. This color palette also evokes the cool light of London wherein the play is set.

Here is a breakdown of the lighting systems:

  • Two color Backlight in L201 (for daylight) and CLR (for the chandelier)
  • High Crosslight in L202
  • Head Hi Crosslight in CLR
  • Diagonal Frontlight in R3216
  • Scenery specials in L202
  • Cyc Top in L281, L161, and L119 as well as GAP508 templates in L201
  • Cyc Bottom in R53, L161, and R68
  • Cyc Sides in L025, R68, L201, and L193
  • The center sunset is a fresnel in L176 and the morning sunrise templates are GAP228 in color L101

All the actor lighting is done with frosted Source-4 Lekos. This will allow me to make shutter cuts to the white performance space and keep as clean a look as possible on the stage. The CYC is lit with various FarCycs, Mini-Strips, Fresnels, and PARs.

As of this writing the lighting paperwork is all finished and sent off to the master electrician and production manager. I have seen an early run through of the piece and have some basic cueing ideas although that will get fleshed out in later meetings with the director. We load in the lighting and scenery at the end of December, focus the lights, and then walk away for a few days over the New Year. When we come back in January we will begin lighting rehearsals.

Doing a post like this which goes into the specifics of a design for a show is new for me (I typically stick to theory). How was it for you as a reader? Would you like to see more of this?

Drop me a line in comments and let me know what you think.

All content Copyleft - LucasKrech.com, please Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • email

A Designer Prepares

Wednesday, June 17th, 2009

I am writing a short three part series over at Isaac Butler’s blog titled A Designer Prepares. Part one is up here.

All content Copyleft - LucasKrech.com, please Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • email

Like a Blind Date

Wednesday, January 21st, 2009

I had my first design meeting this morning for The Floating Lightbulb that I will be designing in San Francisco this spring. The director and entire design team are all new to me. I find this to be a curious experience as the vast majority of shows I have designed over the last several years have come to me through personal connection. Either some or all of the team are people I have worked with before, or I meet a director or producer at some social function. Sometimes a designer I have worked with previously recommends my work to a director or producer, but even then there is the personal connection. In this case, it was none of those situations. Rather I sent an email to the producer and they liked my work enough to ask me in for a meeting and then hired me for the job.

These situations always feel a little odd to me. Most of the time is spent getting a sense of where your collaborators are coming from. This is not necessarily even artistic in nature, Rather, you are simply trying to get a hold on the personalities of the folk you are working with. Some art does get discussed, of course, but it is almost incidental at these first meetings to developing a shorthand with your collaborators.

The shorthand is not something you can force. Rather it derives from working together and learning what “moody” or “bright” or “shadowy” or “blue” means to different people. Even common cultural referents must be learned and understood. “Noir” to one director may be all about lighting, while to another costuming and another acting style. The more you work with a similar group of collaborators the more you learn what each person means with their language and the work delves deeper into the play earlier in the process.

In New York, I worked with similar groups of people all the time. Because of this, there was a common short hand and ease of expression with regards to design ideas. I now find myself working on my fourth show in the Bay Area and with my fourth wholly new creative team. While I know that it is only a matter of time before I begin working in overlapping circles of directors and designers, for the moment it appears to be something like dating. You get out of a relationship and suddenly find yourself meeting and interacting with all these new people, trying to understand them, who they are, where they came from and where they are going, to see if you are a good fit.

Unlike this first meeting for Lightbulb, Dracul was like the kind of working situation I am used to. I had done a show with The Crucible a few years ago and was familiar with the basic aesthetic they were coming from. The director and I both knew each other from our time at San Francisco Opera and had a very similar working vocabulary from which to begin. Despite having never actually worked together on a show we were able to quickly devise a shorthand that allowed us to communicate ideas quickly and efficiently. Ultimately this made the process very smooth and a total joy to be a part of.

Next week I fly down to Virginia to begin work on Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat. I have worked on a half-dozen shows down there to date, two of them by the director of Joseph. The shorthand is already there. We each have a basic understanding of the aesthetic place the other is coming from. Thus far our phone and internet conversations have been relatively smooth.

Obviously there can be and often are misunderstandings and disagreements. But more often than not they tend to be around the details rather than the fundamental aesthetics of the piece. Developing a shorthand also helps bypass a lot of those misunderstandings as well as shortening the length of the disagreement.

Collaboration, as found in the theatre, only works when it is a win/win situation. If any person or aesthetic viewpoint “loses,” the piece suffers. Finding a means of integrating varying and disparate aesthetic perspectives is what creates the synergistic magic that is theatre and opera and dance.

All content Copyleft - LucasKrech.com, please Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • email

The Desperate Hours

Wednesday, October 15th, 2008

Directed by Richard Rose
Scenery by Richard Finkelstein
Costumes by Kimberly Stockton
Sound by Bobby Beck

desp___01

desp___02

desp___03

desp___04

desp___05

desp___06

desp___07

desp___08

Images courtesy Richard Finkelstein

All content Copyleft - LucasKrech.com, please Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • email

Quote for Today

Sunday, September 21st, 2008

Disney is the closest thing this country has to a common spiritual experience.

~~Eugene Wolf, Actor Barter Theatre

All content Copyleft - LucasKrech.com, please Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • email

An old post WRT a new discussion

Saturday, May 3rd, 2008

With all the recent talk of “how theatre failed America” I thought I might repost something I wrote almost two years ago.

The original post is here.

Enjoy!

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Writer Warren Ellis created a series called The Global Frequency in which he posits the existence of a global network whose mission is to save the world from destruction. Rather than superheros who fly around in red capes, we find more or less ordinary citizens connected by cellphones and other wireless networks. Each person on ‘The Frequency’ is some kind of specialist in a given field. In the pilot to a now abandoned TV series based on the work, one of the people needed to prevent a major disaster is an olympic gymnast. Not your typical comic book character.

The point is that in a world with the networked potentials that we have today, limiting our activities to traditional notions of role and geography, be they crime fighting or artistic, is looking backwards. The Poor player, while being somewhat self deprecating, makes the important and necessary observation that we need to reorient our vision.

There has been a lot of talk in the last few days regarding Terry Teachout’s recent article. He points out that some of the best theatre being made in the US is occurring in regional theatres. Interestingly enough, this theatre is being made on the same model as The Global Frequency. That is, teams of artists are assembled from across the country, if not internationally, to create works for a localized community. A need is found within a given socio-geographic space, for a particular kind of work. The artists who can best manifest that work are brought together to create. These works in turn, if successful, often go on tour or end up as co-productions with other regional theatres.

This is an amazing feat and something made possible precisely because of modern technologies. The Looking Glass Theater in Chicago is one company that comes to mind when I think of this networked national theatre. I was fortunate enough to board-op their co-production of Metamorphoses with the Berkeley Repertory Theatre a number of years ago before it came to Broadway. As the show toured cast members would leave and new ones would be added in, so there was an interesting mixture of the original ensemble and local actors, one of whom I had worked with at Impact Theatre a year or so before.

There are local theater’s all across the US. This is the New York Off-Off-Broadway scene or the companies I have worked with in California, Impact and ERP among others. The Poor Player tells us of ones in Buffalo, NY. The regional theatre movement of the 1960′s and 1970′s broke the stranglehold on American Theatre that New York had and created a vital new model for producing works in this country. Even as the original intent of these institution evolved to be more national in scope, smaller companies crop up to take on the role of local theatre. But in our connected world it is not enough to simply call for isolationist tribalism. We must look at how to further connection and cross pollination between artists and communities. We must look forward, not just back at the past.

The voice of Duluth might live in Sacramento and the costume designer who understand her lives in Minneapolis. Unless there is a network, a Global Frequency, this artistic team might never find one another. Creating theatre is never so simple an issue as geography or even friendship. These things are important, but in the end it is about finding those people with whom you have a sympathetic artistic relationship and creating works that are vital and powerful. As I said yesterday it is important to look for ways to expand the network.

When I look at the US government I see an entity that is wholly out of touch with the modern world. Where everywhere else technology and ideology are breaking down traditional boundaries, through organizations like the EU and technologies like VOIP and social networking sites, the US Federal government is concerned with Sovereignty. They want to create physical barriers and psychological barriers between US and THEM. They want to reclaim a 19th century idea of the nation state complete with hard power dominance, while everywhere else energy is flowing towards a post-sovereign state influencing events through soft power. There is nothing wrong with history. I find it fascinating to read of events gone by. But it seems silly to me to try and force the energies of change into old fashioned models that do not sit harmoniously with the contemporary world.

But the old models of Self and identity are washing away with time. Be they national or personal, the individual is on the way out. A holistic organic model of self needs be explored. The connections between examined rather than boundaries.

The future is here. We need only reorient our vision and embrace its potential.

All content Copyleft - LucasKrech.com, please Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • email

Freedom of Information, Act

Wednesday, March 26th, 2008

It has been a while since I have written anything here. Lots of posting but mostly other people’s words. The main reason for this has been a personal shift in how I spend my free time. While blogging has for several years now been my primary hobby, that has shifted in recent months. I have been relearning a skill/instrument that I gave up a number of years ago, the turntable.

Last weekend I played my first set in public. It was quite well received. A mix of ambient/minimal techno and classical. The electronic music I played was all composed to be freely distributed. Licensed under a Creative Commons non-commercial distribution license, the music was made to be free.

The idea of truly free information, in my opinion the foundation to a truly free society, is slowly gaining ground. In music and software circles, the model of the mega-corporations are seen for the inherent failure they represent. The technology has evolved beyond the capacity for an institution to control its distribution. Fighting a war against consumers is a losing battle.

There are free software alternatives for every major commercial piece of software from word processing to image manipulation to web browsing to operating systems and more.

The group I was playing for has been producing all night music and dance events for over 12 years on an open source model. Planning procedures are maintained on a wiki, the entire organization is run by volunteers and everything from food, to music, to entrance to the event is given freely. Donations are asked for but in no way required.

In the theatre an open source model is still very much in its infancy. Charles Mee is one of, if not the first playwright to truly embrace open source ethics and aesthetics in his works.

As he says

Sometimes playwrights steal stories and conversations and dreams and intimate revelations from their friends and lovers and call this original.

And sometimes some of us write about our own innermost lives, believing that, then, we have written something truly original and unique. But, of course, the culture writes us first, and then we write our stories. When we look at a painting of the virgin and child by Botticelli, we recognize at once that it is a Renaissance painting—that is it a product of its time and place. We may not know or recognize at once that it was painted by Botticelli, but we do see that it is a Renaissance painting. We see that it has been derived from, and authored by, the culture that produced it.

And yet we recognize, too, that this painting of the virgin and child is not identical to one by Raphael or Ghirlandaio or Leonardo. So, clearly, while the culture creates much of Botticelli, it is also true that Botticelli creates the culture—that he took the culture into himself and transformed it in his own unique way.

And so, whether we mean to or not, the work we do is both received and created, both an adaptation and an original, at the same time. We re-make things as we go.

Another aspect of Free Theatre appears to be opening up as well. While many companies do pay-what-you-can nights, a theater in Ohio is trying that theory out for the whole run of its current production.

Available Light is opening Sheila Callaghan’s Dead City here in Columbus in about 2 weeks. This show is a really big deal for us. Aside from being a beautiful play that we’re all really excited about, it’s also our first show to receive significant public funding, it has the largest cast we’ve put on stage, and it’s in a space that’s costing us about 3 times what we usually pay. (Frequent readers of this blog will remember that I am very ambivalent about that particular fact.)

However, instead responding by playing it safe on other fronts to compensate for the big risks we’re taking, we’ve decided to try another big experiment. We’re making all tickets to all shows for everyone all the time “Pay What You Want”. That’s right, just like Radiohead,Trent Reznor, Saul Williams, Paste Magazine, and a small crop of restaurants.

Free culture is on the rise. It is being written into the very fabric of our larger culture. Much like free(read renewable) energy will replace finite resources like oil and coal, so too will free (read open) culture replace finite and “owned” culture.

its just a matter of time.

All content Copyleft - LucasKrech.com, please Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • email

Mike Daisey Steps Up

Sunday, February 10th, 2008

Link

Every time a regional theater produces Nickel and Dimed, the play based on Barbara Ehrenreich’s book about the working poor in America, I keep hoping the irony will reach up and bitch-slap the staff members as they put actors, the working poor they’re directly responsible for creating, in an agitprop shuck-and-jive dance about that very problem. I keep hoping it will pierce their mantle of smug invulnerability and their specious whining about how television, iPods, Reagan, the NEA, short attention spans, the folly of youth, and a million other things have destroyed American theater.

All content Copyleft - LucasKrech.com, please Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • email

Content with meaning

Wednesday, October 24th, 2007

I had drinks with my friends Jeff and Pilar last night. It was a lot of fun. Jeff may well be the smartest person I know. I know a lot of smart people. I know a lot of really smart people. Really smart people.

It is always an interesting experience interfacing with his brain. When our thought patterns mesh it is a great meeting of the minds. A fabulous time. Then there are the times where he is so far beyond my level of conceptual thinking that I can only sit back and admire. Last night was one of those times.

Topics of conversation ranged from general catching up to art, music, porn, drinking, mutual friends, Bay Area weather, etc. etc. A typical night at the bar.

The issue of aesthetics is such a personal one. It is always interesting to talk to other artists about how they see the world. Hearing them speak about how they see and then looking at their work can be such an intense experience.

I remember hearing Richard Foreman talk about his first video project. How it was such a radical departure from his earlier work. A real aesthetic rupture. Then I saw the piece. To my reckoning it was a Richard Foreman piece with video. But to him this was such a radical shift that it necessitated a revaluation of aesthetics and meaning.

The disparity between what I heard and what I saw caused me to realize how intense his vision is. That the way he sees the world is so specific that what to me appears a small change is to him a tectonic shift of cosmic proportions.

This is the essential nature of art. It is the expression of a worldview. A specific way of seeing. A visual representation of a Being in the world.

Art is a physics of presence. It is the geometry of identity.

Concepts become thin and tangled here at the edges.

Theatre is in many ways a perfect art form for the 21st century. It is inherently collaborative and relies upon the contributions of many. Like web 2.0 the content and the form are distinct and interchangeable. A single script can be placed in any of an infinite number of visual, aural and spatial contexts. The script remains static, but its meaning shifts as its context shifts. Content and meaning are two independent variables along a matrix of experience.

So too a conversation shifts as the surrounding context transforms. As the bar fills, the sun sets, food and alcohol are consumed, the nature of the language alters. Same people, different context. Thus different content.

All content Copyleft - LucasKrech.com, please Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • email

In the best possible way

Sunday, September 23rd, 2007

The Barter Theater is a community theatre in the best possible meaning of the term. It is a fully professional Regional Theatre that produces a wide range of programming specifically for the surrounding community that is its audience. A number of the plays, like the Dracula we open tonight, are adapted to locate them around community issues. This version is set in America in the 1920′s, specifically the Virginia Highlands where Abingdon resides.

The actors and other staff all live in and interact with the community and several are natives of the area. There is a saying that “All theatre is local” and while there are a number of exceptions, this organization certainly proves the rule.

Coming in from out of town to do these shows might, to some, appear to break that idea of serving the community, but I feel it enlarges it. Community is not solely bound by geographical locations. In our contemporary world where distance becomes increasingly mitigated by technologies like the internet fostering cross cultural pollination of ideas, creating works that are inherently part of that larger cultural dialog are vitally important.

And in a way it certainly fits the specifics of this play. The action centers around a foreigner from another country who “can control the weather and shift forms at will.” This is light.

Light is not just illumination. It is the weather, the progression of the day, the moon and the stars. It is the atmosphere that surrounds action and binds disparate activities together. In a world where that atmosphere is controlled by a person of foreign origin how perfect to for the light to be designed by someone from far away.

If all theatre is local, I believe it is equally true that it is about outsiders. True action can only exist when the status quo is out of balance. Without an inequality between the current state of things and ones desire for change there is no reason to act. If we become hungry our desire for food causes us to go and eat.

Theatre is about action.

As such the world must be unbalanced, out of alignment. Almost any play, and this applies to movies and other performance as well, begins with a world out of balance. A crazy king losing the throne, an ancient kingdom beset by plague, a young woman sick with a mysterious illness.

The action of the play is then to right that imbalance, or perhaps, to change the surrounding context such that the world balances along a new axis.

This can only be done by the outsider. The one out of balance, out of harmony, with the surrounding world. Henry V can only lead his country to victory because he was the debaucherous youth. The action of the play can only be portrayed by the crazy people who inhabit the world of the theatre.

A world set apart.

Like Halloween or Carnival, a person dons the clothing of another and for some span of time, rejects their own ego to inhabit the life of someone else. Worlds are created within, but apart from the surrounding world. A Temporary Autonomous Zone.

Even at a practical level our world exists apart from much the rest of the world. We go to work such that others can come for recreation. We rest on the day when most return to work. We live in fantasy and create new possibilities out of language, cloth, wood and light.

Part of, but apart from, the world. In the community but perhaps not of the community.

All content Copyleft - LucasKrech.com, please Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • email

Creative Commons License

All text and images on this site unless otherwise noted are licensed under a Creative Commons License.